E-mail  |  Print  |  Share  |  Back to Home
For full, free access to TVNewsCheck.com, register today. It's fast, easy and free. If already registered, click here to log in.
Close Window
TVNEWSCHECK FOCUS ON BUSINESS

TV Stations Rebound, But How High?

By Price Colman
TVNewsCheck, Oct 28 2009, 7:46 AM ET

When the economy starting hammering the broadcasting business last year, Gray Television President-COO Robert Prather kept the faith, telling security analysts that he was putting most of his personal wealth into his company's depressed stock, then trading at around $4.

After months and months of stomach-churning uncertainty that saw those shares trade as low as 19 cents a year ago, Prather should be feeling a little better about his retirement strategy.

Story continues after the ad

Since the end of the first quarter, Gray shares, along with those of other pure-play station groups, have rebounded nicely. Gray closed yesterday at $2.15.

While covenant violations, loan defaults and bankruptcies still loom over the beat-up sector, the upward swing in stock and debt prices is a sign that investors think revenues — and the broadcasting business — have bottomed out.

"My impression was that Wall Street six months ago thought that we were all going into bankruptcy or restructuring or something," Prather says, noting that improving bond prices apparently led the way. "Somewhere along the way they realized that wasn't going to happen and that there was some value in these groups in stock and bond prices."

Prices are still but a fraction of historic highs. But for the few publicly traded pure-plays — including Gray, Belo, Nexstar and LIN — it's psychologically and financially reassuring to climb out of the dangerous depths of the penny-stock pit.

Says Nexstar Broadcasting CEO Perry Sook: "I think it's a realization by investors that the end of the world didn't happen, that the stock and debt sell-off was ridiculously overdone and as the stock market in particular tends to look forward to recovery in 2010, plus political revenues, these stocks are incredibly cheap by historical standards."

A snapshot: Since the end of the first quarter, Belo shares are up over 500 percent; Gray, nearly 500 percent; Nexstar, more than 300 percent; and LIN, nearly 300 percent.

"What I'm hearing is an awful lot of ‘It's not perfect, but it's getting better and getting better faster than we thought it would,' " says station broker and investment adviser Larry Patrick of Patrick Communications.

But what optimism there is, is guarded.

"We have six different models running right now for 2010," says Sook. "The worst case: No growth in core revenues. The best case: mid single-digit growth. The art in forecasting is not only how much but when."

The other good news is that the improving economy and thawing debt markets may lead to more refinancings. That's key to relieving oppressive debt burdens and gaining breathing room on debt-related covenants.

"I think you'll see more heavily leveraged broadcasters potentially coming to tap debt markets over the next 60 to 90 days," says Barry Lucas of Gabelli & Co. "That's available partly because there's anticipation the economy is going to get a little bit better over time."

A recent sign: Sinclair Broadcast Group is buying back two different series of notes for better prices than proposed just two months ago. It also plans a private placement of 12 percent notes and will begin paying back a loan that Cunningham Broadcasting, for whom Sinclair operates six stations under an LMA, defaulted on.

Sinclair said in mid-July it faced a cross-default on the Cunningham loan that could push it into bankruptcy.

Activity in the high-yield, or junk, category is one catalyst for improving equity and debt prices, says Richard Schmaeling, senior vice president-CFO at LIN Television.

"The high yield market has recovered dramatically," he says. "A lot of people saw high-yield bonds running and piled on."

Add that to companies renegotiating covenants (for a price, of course), improved cost structures and technical buying linked to anticipation of an improving ad market and the rebound in equity and debt prices is easily explained, Schmaeling says.

But he seasons that stew with a healthy dose of salt.

"We think that the reality is that consumer spending is going to take quite a long time to recover to pre-recession levels," he says. "It's not going to come roaring back. Consumer credit continues to contract and likely will contract into 2010. Unemployment is likely to stay high. We're not going to see a ‘V' recovery in advertising."

Kevin Shea, a managing director at Loughlin Meghji & Co., which provides various advisory services to financially distressed firms in or out of bankruptcy, sees little reason for optimism — yet.

"I have talked to some CEOs, and frankly they don't know why their stock is up," he says. "When I look at pacings, information on clients' traffic systems, I don't see any activity that translates into rising stock or bond prices.

"The best thing I can say about the business, and this is not the beginning of any meaningful trend, is we're seeing the slope of decline is less severe.... I | More …

1 2 Next >

Comments (17) - Post a comment

Rocker Nicknameposted 28 days, 11 hours, 13 minutes ago
It's great that the recession is, or will end. But nobody's calling for a roaring recovery. Moreover, when assessing the prospects for the broadcast sector, you have to look to secular changes occuring in media, marketing and advertising generally, and television specifically. Audience shares will continue to decline. Advertisers will continue to shift $ to interactive media where R.O.I. is easier to calculate (although good news is there is a reawakening to the value of brands and the fact that too much focus on the bottom of the funnel ultimately backfires if there's not also an effort at the top). Bottom line though - like newspapers, the broadcasting industry is still headed for the abyss. That was apparent even before the recession - just accelerated by 2-5 years. Good news: After more pain, and a period of major consolidation, there is a future for those left standing. I would look to stocks/companies that can articulate a vision/plan, evince flexibility and an ability to adapt, and have resources sufficient to execute. We're not talking huge investments, but there has to be an R&D capacity, and more importantly, a willingness to embrace aggressive business transformation at all levels.
formergm Nicknameposted 28 days, 10 hours, 37 minutes ago
Stations will continue to lose audience at a steady rate. Most local newscasts are dreadful, and adults 25-54 know it.
TVinmyblood Nicknameposted 28 days, 8 hours, 40 minutes ago
Based on your comments I understand why you're a "formergm"
formergm Nicknameposted 28 days, 8 hours, 1 minute ago
"TVinmyblood" - Sorry you feel the need to make a personal attack. You obviously work and live in a fantasy land. It's heartbreaking to watch local TV stations slowly dying from their own mismanagement and negligence.
tjxx Nicknameposted 28 days, 8 hours, 18 minutes ago
I think these guys are all delusional. The seismic shift has occurred in the local broadcast market and they better learn to deal with it or can anyone say"General Motors/ Chrysler". The days of mass media spending are behind you. Dont these people know that the 18-49's are spending twice the amout of time with a computer than their tv set. They still have not figured out a profitable scenario for the internet and are using it as a step child to their diminishing news product,assuming they have one. Live sports and entertainment is the future of broadcast tv. I really think they have missed the market and let the cuts continue! Anyone who knows the broadcast business knows that egos run rampant and preception is always more important than reality. They did not see the change in front of them occurring fast enough and now they are paying the price .It's too late, get used to it boys!
PhillyPhlash Nicknameposted 28 days, 8 hours, 7 minutes ago
Fact is, broadcast digichannels are breathing new life into the station biz. I'm forsaking my Comcast-connected HDTV to go upstairs to the bedroom set to watch "Retro TV", a digichannel carried by WFMZ Allentown -- a channel that Comcast isn't carrying. (That is, on nights when the OTA signal is robust enough to reach me.) Also watching "This TV" on WPHL-17 digi, and "Y-Arts" from WHYY (also having DTV OTA reception problems with their signals.) OTA broadcast going multichannel -- for free -- is being kept something of a secret. Why isn't there more promotion of these valuable programming offerings? Is it because the money men behind big media conglomerates are willing to sacrifice the station business to make all TV, pay TV? Prove me wrong, broadcasters -- promote your product!
PSIPthing Nicknameposted 28 days, 7 hours, 39 minutes ago
it's always funny to read you extending your personal conditions to the market in general. This is pure personal anecdote. Most people who watch television prefer network television, and fresh content. This is "not exactly" what ThisTv and Retro TV provide, unless one is in a time warp. And, their ratings seem to show it, to the extent they even have ratings. It can be argued that the stations offering these channels are sacrificing their transport streams to show retro content when they could be developing and experimenting with the content that will thrive in the post-broadcast-network world. Note that the broadcast networks aren't exactly programming new content on Saturday.
PhillyPhlash Nicknameposted 28 days, 4 hours, 32 minutes ago
Well, at least there's no "black helicopters" in the paid troll's response today.... doubt that new shows can be developed on the budget that allows RTV to satisfy viewers' need for Rockford Files re-runs...
tjxx Nicknameposted 28 days, 7 hours, 39 minutes ago
A very wise man told me years ago that if you were not in the "software business". the "idea" business that you would be vulnerable. What ( product)shows do local broadcast stations really produce except local news or an additional community event/parade/sporting event? People are turning away from local news for the internet, why? They get their news on their timeline not the stations. Duh! Local stations are distributors of network product and the gravy days of their high profit margins and high stock prices(if they are a public company) are over ! In a general sense you would have to be crazy to invest in any stock of a local media company! It's a license to lose $$ as these companies will continue to see.
formergm Nicknameposted 28 days, 6 hours, 47 minutes ago
"tjxx" - You are spot on. Let me add one comment to yours regarding people turning away from local news for the internet. IMO - stations are literally forcing viewers away. How? First - a mind-numbing commercial and promotional glut. The average station airs an incredible 11minutes of non program time in every half hour newscast. 20 years ago that figure was around 8 minutes. Secong - content is largely defined by crime (Somewhere in the DMA there must be a domestic homicide.), car wrecks, and weather hype. The typical station airs 3 weather segments in every half-hour newscast - adding up to around 6 minutes. You can be sure that stray shower 80 miles away will be highlighted using all the station's weather toys. So - about `1/3 of the total content is devoted to weather hype. The above is a recipe for continued viewer erosion - as you can clearly see in almost all market rating books.
PhillyPhlash Nicknameposted 28 days, 4 hours, 28 minutes ago
tjxx/formergm combo = lame psy op. No way either of you were ever in the broadcasting biz. So why are you here? http://nowpublic.com/world/govt-fusion-center-spying-pretext-harass-and-censor
Doubtful Nicknameposted 28 days, 6 hours, 29 minutes ago
It's all about content. Local stations need to take back control of their destinies by producing more original content. For some stations that will be more news, for other stations it will be local entertainment, still other stations will embrace advertiser-supported, locally-produced fare. As network and syndicated programming continues to lose audience shares due to a combination of overexposure of reruns, bland first-run, and non-syndcateable reality programming, locally-produced content will provide stations with their only true differentiator. Leveraging locally-produced content on multiple distribution platforms to provide local businesses (local direct, not agency) with affordable marketing solutions is the model for the future for local stations. Original, exclusive, locally-relevant is the answer.
PSIPthing Nicknameposted 28 days, 3 hours, 52 minutes ago
but, the key is how to do this profitably. I lament the dearth of non-news local programming in the markets I can sample off-air. Being largely passive repeaters of content generated elsewhere just binds you to a network and not necessarily your local audience, because you have no control over what the network feeds you. It's not unlike a McDonalds's franchisee ..
tjxx Nicknameposted 27 days, 7 hours, 32 minutes ago
Hey PhillyPhlash. I ran stations and sales departments all over the country. You are in denial. Hope it all works out for you in the socalled "broadcasting business". I saw the freight train coming and moved on to other successful businesses. You are still in the caboose! Their is plenty of life after broadcasting and you better wake up!
formergm Nicknameposted 27 days, 5 hours, 58 minutes ago
PillyPhlash: I was a successful GM in three medium market NBC and CBS affliliated stations - and now happily semi-retired. You are certainly entitled to your opinion - as are tjxx and me. It would be helpful if you were less judgemental and more coherent.
David Jacquemin posted 27 days, 3 hours, 10 minutes ago
Producing localized, non-news content, profitability, will only occur when local videographers are shown "how-to" produce quality, broadcast standards content. Online software solutions have yet to create an interface that's attractive (non-threatening) and easy to use, but it will happen in the near term. Additionally, developing a comprehensive, long-term community strategy, in conjunction with UGC, is essential, costs little and, is easy to implement. Engaging our audiences, seeking their creative solutions-and they do have them-is a good place to start.
E-mail  |  Print  |  Share  |  Back to Home
More Business Stories |
More Stations Stories

Classifieds

Search All

The Market

  Symbol Last Change (%)
     Nasdaq 2169.18 -6.83 (-0.31%)
     NYSE 7170.26 -16.07 (-0.22%)
     S&P 500 1105.65 -0.59 (-0.05%)
Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Get quotes, news, data
Source: FinancialContent.com

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for Nov 23, 2009
  • 1.  cbs4.0/10
  • 2.  fox3.6/9
  • 3.  abc3.4/9
  • 4.  nbc1.8/5
  • 5.  uni1.4/4
  • 6.  upn0.6/1
Source: Nielsen Media Research