Jessell at Large

Aereo Still Trying To Get By Without Paying

After its loss at the Supreme Court, Aereo's new tack is to declare itself a cable system with the ability to use the compulsory license to cover the liability just as every regular cable systems does. The problem with that is that it has still not acknowledged in any forum that it is willing to accept not only the privileges of being a cable system, most notably the compulsory license, but also the obligations, most notably retransmission consent. Without a commitment to pay retrans, Aereo is simply playing the same old game, trying to skate by without paying for programming.
TVNewsCheck,

Desperate to save itself, Aereo is now rolling out Plan B.

In the wake of the June 25 Supreme Court ruling that shot down its juvenile low-tech scheme for circumventing copyright law, the online distributor of local broadcast signals this week told the federal district court in New York that is now overseeing the case that it wants to continue operating in a more conventional manner, with the cable compulsory license.

Story continues after the ad

Created by Congress in 1976, the compulsory license enables bona fide cable systems to retransmit local broadcast signals without violating copyrights by paying a token fee to the Copyright Office of the Library of Congress.

As required by law, Aereo said it is going ahead with the necessary paperwork with the Copyright Office.

But is Aereo a bona fide cable system entitled to the license?

In making the case to the district court that it is, Aereo is relying somewhat ironically on the Supreme Court ruling that has pushed it to the precipice. The ruling found that Aereo was nothing novel, that is was  "for all practical purposes" a cable system and liable for copyright.

Brand Connections

Well, the never-say-die Aereo execs and lawyers figured, if the high court says Aereo is "substantially similar" and bears an "overwhelming likeness" to a cable system, let's declare ourselves one, acknowledge the copyright liability and then use the compulsory license to cover the liability just as every regular cable systems does.

In its letter to the district court, Aereo said the Supreme Court ruling trumps the 2012 federal appeals court ruling that denied the compulsory license to another online distributor of broadcast signals, ivi.tv.

Aereo asked the court for an immediate ruling on its eligibility for the compulsory license, saying its survival was in "jeopardy" because of the Supreme Court ruling. "Aereo is taking in no new revenue, and continuing to incur enormous costs such as employee salaries, equipment and lease payments and vendor payments."

The problem with Plan B — and evidence that Aereo is not ready to grow up and play by the rules — is that it has still not acknowledged in any forum that it is willing to accept not only the privileges of being a cable system, most notably the compulsory license, but also the obligations, most notably retransmission consent and things like must-carry, network non-dupe, syndex and sports blackout.

The Communications Act and FCC rules require, among other things, bona fide cable systems to pay broadcasters if they carry their signals and the broadcasters demand payment.

Aereo didn't say anything about paying retrans to the district court and it declined to speak to me about it this week.

Without a commitment to pay retrans, Aereo is simply playing the same old game, trying to skate by without paying for programming. It's behaving like the ridiculous FilmOn, which has been claiming cable status for the compulsory license, while avoiding retrans payments.

My guess is that Aereo's business model collapses if it has to pay, say, $1.50 per sub per month for each of the four network O&Os or affiliates in each market. That would add $6 to the cost of a basic service that was retailing for $8.

Aereo can't have it both ways. It can't be a cable system for purposes of the compulsory license and not be a cable system for purposes of retrans. Let me be more precise: Broadcasters can't allow Aereo to have it both ways.

Broadcast attorneys I spoke with this week think Aereo's compulsory license gambit is a long shot. They cite the ivi.tv case and say that just because the Supreme Court said that Aereo is similar to a cable system doesn't mean that it is a cable system.

But if Aereo does get a favorable ruling on the compulsory license, it will be imperative that broadcasters race to the FCC and get that agency to dub Aereo a cable system so that it has to pay retrans and comply with other cable rules and regulations. (The FCC already has a proceeding open addressing how to handle online video distributors, but it's been gathering dust.)

As I said, Aereo and its ilk cannot be allowed to have it both ways.

However, as I said in this space two weeks ago, I believe it that it is in the best interest of TV stations to nurture a class of online video distributors with all the rights and obligations of conventional cable and satellite operators — that is, distributors with the compulsory license and the duty to pay retrans if demanded.

Such distributors will provide local broadcasters with new outlets for their programming and new sources of revenue. By their nature, these outlets will reach viewers where broadcast signals can't-- on their desktops and, more important, on their smartphones and other mobile devices. Broadcasting will be truly ubiquitous again, available on every screen.

Tags

Comments (8) -

tjxx Nickname posted over 2 years ago
What do you expect from Barry Diller????
Oh Puhleeze posted over 2 years ago
Jessell, a question if I may: Are you saying if an Aereo subscriber is willing to pay $1.50 per month for each local OTA signal that it wouldn't and shouldn't be enough? If not enough, what price point would be reasonable for an OTA channel? If that wasn't the point can you dumb it down for this OTA-Only viewer who only wants a clean, local affiliate signal to watch?
Kok1 Nickname posted over 2 years ago
What about "must carry" for all the infomercial channels , under the ruling I imagine the must add them ..? They have a rough rode ahead
MediaBigData Nickname posted over 2 years ago
There is some decent tech underneath Aereo's incorrect legal interpretation and business model(s) based on it.
Homebrew Nickname posted over 2 years ago
You realize that there is not a shred of honesty in Barry Diller, just like Charlie Eagan he will always be a THIEF and line his pockets at the expense of the content providers. Eventually AEREO will go defunct just like LightSquared's attempt to destroy our GPS system. His investors will sue his axx just like Philip Falconeā€™s investors are for the LightSquared fiasco that resulted in HUGE losses to the investors. ONCE A THIEF ALWAYS A THIEF. I have been saying this for over a year now, you remember my constant posts of "AEREO=THEFT" so don't be surprised by the attempt of AEREO to steal more programming.
Roger Thornhill Nickname posted over 2 years ago
What?! Chet said Aereo had no plan B. I guess when their back is against the wall and they have investors to answer to they can come up with one (or two). Again, I urge networks and broadcasters to let Aereo go. Make the necessary agreements with them and let them do business. A much bigger fight is looming and it is one that requires all our attention and resources.
LeftField2010 Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Just fold up your tent and go away already. Nobody wants to play with you.
videographer Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Once again the broadcasters miss the forest for the trees. There will never be an ATSC-based mobile DTV system, and no station should have to cough up 35% of their soon-to-be-subdivided bandwidth to feed a Dyle kludge that no one in the public will ever pay for. Aereo is mobile local DTV, deployable now, that will let anyone with a smartphone (tech that people WILL buy) watch Action News anywhere in your market. Please explain to me how that is a bad thing! How much per month do cable companies pay per sub for Station X's signal? Charge that to Aereo, see if they can make a business model out of it, and get it going.
Marketshare Blog Playout Blog

Twitter

TVNewsCheck

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for September 22, 2016
  • 1.
    4.0/14
  • 2.
    1.7/6
  • 3.
    1.3/5
  • 4.
    0.9/3
  • 5.
    0.6/2
  • 6.
    0.3/1
Source: Nielsen

Reviews

  • Rob Owen

    Easily fall’s best broadcast network comedy pilot, NBC’s The Good Place offers a clever high-concept premise that’s complemented with intelligent, sometimes absurdist humor. Created by Michael Schur, co-creator of NBC’s Parks and Recreation, The Good Place is a highly serialized series that’s essentially set in heaven and stars Kristen Bell and Ted Danson. NBC made five episodes of The Good Place available for review, and the show not only holds up, but also it improves, deepening characters that initially feel one-note and frequently leaving viewers guessing with cliffhanger endings to many of the episodes. The combination of snappy dialogue and winning but flawed characters makes The Good Place a great bet for fans of smart TV comedy.

  • Maureen Ryan

    Pitch has swagger, for good reason. It gets the big things right; the Fox drama about the first female baseball player in the Major Leagues is one of the year’s most assured and exciting debuts. But part of what impresses about the pilot is also the way it confidently strings together so many small but telling details. Ginny (Kylie Bunbury) is the first woman to be called up from the minors to the big leagues, and no show since Friday Night Lights has done a better job of portraying the internal and external pressures that weigh heavily on young athletes asked to do much more than merely succeed on the field. Pitch will likely do a good job of getting viewers to root for it. The hope is that the show won’t be an impressive, short-lived curiosity, but rather a long-term phenomenon.

  • Kevin Fallon

    In a fall TV season that’s already making a splash for championing diverse, distinctive voices in an array of projects that they created, wrote, and starred in, Better Things on FX stands out. The show is created by, written by, and starsPamela Adlon. She plays Sam Fox, the single mother of three daughters modeled after her own reality-show-ready experience raising three girls in Los Angeles following a divorce. Sam is also, like Adlon, a working actress — on shows both raunchy, a la Californication, and animated for children, like her role on Recess. It’s a refreshingly blunt take on single motherhood without sacrificing the warmth of parental love, portraying the dance between selfishness and selflessness that’s at the heart of being a parent — especially one weathering the hormonal fireworks of a household of four women at different ages.

  • David Wiegand

    The fall TV season doesn’t count as much as it used to — we already know that. But no matter how many retreads the broadcast networks throw at viewers in the next few months, this fall will be memorable because of the premiere of Atlanta on Tuesday, Sept. 6, on FX. The half-hour comedy created by and starring Donald Glover (Community), simply and brilliantly recalibrates our expectations of what a TV comedy is and how black lives are portrayed on the medium.

  • Louisa Ada Seltzer

    The second reboot of the 1980s John Candy movie Uncle Buck, bumped by ABC from midseason, has the same tired jokes you'll find on any second-rate sitcom. Too bad, because Mike Epps is appealing and ABC would be wise to keep him around for future shows, but there’s just not enough to this show to suggest it will last past summer. It also airs against NBC’s America’s Got Talent, summer’s No. 1 program on broadcast, which may make it even harder to find an audience.

  • Neil Genzlinger

    Bryan Cranston brings his Tony Award-winning interpretation of President Lyndon B. Johnson to television in an adaptation of the Robert Schenkkan play All the Way, and it’s still quite a sight to behold, just as it was on Broadway in 2014. Nothing beats witnessing this kind of larger-than-life portrayal onstage, of course. But the television version, presented by HBO, offers plenty of rewards, allowing Cranston to work the close-ups and liberating him from the confines of a theater set. Cranston’s performance is a gem — in his hands, this accidental president comes across as an amazing bundle of contradictions, someone who seems at once too vulgar for the job and just right for it.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad