Sinclair Plan Shot Down By FCC Fine Print

An examination of the FCC’s 484 pages of incentive auction rules shows the commission has rejected a proposal to allow a blanket waiver for all a group’s stations if the group turned down federal reimbursement for moving. In addition, the FCC made clear that it believes it has wiggle room under Congress’ mandate that it make “all reasonable efforts” to preserve the coverage areas and populations served by stations required to move to new channels during the repacking.

The FCC has all but slammed the door on a broadcast industry proposal that could have made it easier for TV station groups to introduce a new advanced television standard in the U.S., broadcast industry sources said Tuesday.

Under the proposal, originally pitched at the FCC by Sinclair Broadcast Group, TV station groups that agreed to forego federal reimbursement for any stations forced to move to new channels during the agency’s incentive auction repacking process would have received a waiver allowing them to use the existing spectrum for all their stations’ channels for traditional broadcast and other new services.

Story continues after the ad

Some broadcasters, led by Sinclair, want to be able to use at least part of their existing spectrum capacity to introduce an advanced TV standard that would make it easier for them to broadcast a variety of services to consumer mobile devices.

But in the fine print of the 484-page text of the incentive auction rules the agency released June 2, the FCC rejected the request for a blanket waiver that would have applied to all of a group broadcaster’s stations.

Instead, the FCC said that waiver requests would be considered only for the individual stations that are specifically required to move during the repacking, with the broadcaster’s agreement to forego federal reimbursement a point in a waiver’s favor.

Also under the FCC rule adopted, the broadcaster would have to continue offering at least one free broadcast TV program stream to the public.

Brand Connections

One well-placed broadcast industry attorney told TVNewsCheck that the original proposal could have substantially reduced industry demand for repacking expense reimbursements from the federal government.

Serious concerns have been raised that the $1.75 billion fund established by Congress to reimburse the industry for auction-related relocation costs won’t be enough to go around, with broadcasters forced to pick up some of the costs on their own.

A broadcast industry attorney said that the proposal as pitched could have taken a substantial number of station groups out of the reimbursement pool, by allowing them to plan for all of their stations. “A win-win for everybody,” the source said.

But as the rule came down, it applies only to the handful of a group’s stations that may be forced to move during the repacking, severely undermining a group broadcaster’s incentive to participate, the source said, adding: “It’s just short-sighted. It’s useless.”

Another industry source said: “The waiver of the service rules section [in the incentive auction rules] is basically a rejection of Sinclair’s proposal. Sinclair proposed the only meaningful way forward.”

In the text of its rules, the FCC said it would try to hold repacking costs down and didn’t have reason, “at this time,” to believe that the $1.75 billion would fall short.

“If future developments suggest that $1.75 billion is insufficient to cover eligible costs, the commission delegates authority to the Media Bureau to develop a prioritization scheme for reimbursement claims,” the FCC said in its auction rules.

Also in the rules, the FCC made clear that it believes it has wiggle room under Congress’ mandate that it make “all reasonable efforts” to preserve the coverage areas and populations served by stations required to move to new channels during the repacking.

“Congress included the term ‘reasonable’ in the statute [authorizing the incentive auction] because it anticipated that broadcasters’ interests would not be the only interests the commission would have to consider in the repacking process,” the FCC said.

“Accordingly, we do not believe the statute requires us to precisely and strictly preserve broadcasters’ coverage areas and populations served without considering the other objectives in the Spectrum Act.”


Comments (6) -

Insider Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Congress, which should have GOP majority on both sides in the Fall, really need to rein this thing in.
Chuck Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Too bad the FCC is not concerned about viewer's interests. Their belief that they do not have to "preserve broadcasters' coverage areas and populations served" confirms my suspicion that we viewers who do not have pay TV will likely lose service. The FCC is supporting cable and satellite over antenna TV.
Insider Nickname posted over 2 years ago
If you read the story, broadcasting a free OTA channel is required. Of course, what you get on the free OTA channel will possibly (and probably if Aereo is deemed legal by SCOTUS this month) not be in the same format you see today. A split screen with .1 and .2 in a box OTA with audio selectable for either (.1 by default) with channel numbers of the Cable/Telco/Satellite number under the window seems like a real option, with the full resolution picture available only on the systems that pay retransmission fees.
Snap Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Broadcasters (or the networks) certainly may slit their own throats. That will be their own problem!!! Pay television is living on borrowed time.
Insider Nickname posted over 2 years ago
If you want quality (and not to debate what that means), the money has to come from someone.
Johnny Fever posted over 2 years ago
I thought that maybe the GOP would get on the bandwagon to keep this travesty from turning into a total trainwreck. Many stations do NOT have the same HDTV 'footprint' that they did with NTSC - so the FCC modeling programs are already flawed. OTA HDTV must be preserved and the service footprint should be as large as, or larger than it already is. The FCC erred in not give a 'group discount pass', especially if this program runs out of cash. They also need to start at the borders where they'll soon realized that there is NO spectrum to harvest there for cell co's as they have stations filled to the brim in the 40's in the Pt Hurnon/Detroit/Toledo areas near Canada.
Marketshare Blog Playout Blog




Overnights, adults 18-49 for September 26, 2016
  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
Source: Nielsen


  • Rob Owen

    Easily fall’s best broadcast network comedy pilot, NBC’s The Good Place offers a clever high-concept premise that’s complemented with intelligent, sometimes absurdist humor. Created by Michael Schur, co-creator of NBC’s Parks and Recreation, The Good Place is a highly serialized series that’s essentially set in heaven and stars Kristen Bell and Ted Danson. NBC made five episodes of The Good Place available for review, and the show not only holds up, but also it improves, deepening characters that initially feel one-note and frequently leaving viewers guessing with cliffhanger endings to many of the episodes. The combination of snappy dialogue and winning but flawed characters makes The Good Place a great bet for fans of smart TV comedy.

  • Maureen Ryan

    Pitch has swagger, for good reason. It gets the big things right; the Fox drama about the first female baseball player in the Major Leagues is one of the year’s most assured and exciting debuts. But part of what impresses about the pilot is also the way it confidently strings together so many small but telling details. Ginny (Kylie Bunbury) is the first woman to be called up from the minors to the big leagues, and no show since Friday Night Lights has done a better job of portraying the internal and external pressures that weigh heavily on young athletes asked to do much more than merely succeed on the field. Pitch will likely do a good job of getting viewers to root for it. The hope is that the show won’t be an impressive, short-lived curiosity, but rather a long-term phenomenon.

  • Kevin Fallon

    In a fall TV season that’s already making a splash for championing diverse, distinctive voices in an array of projects that they created, wrote, and starred in, Better Things on FX stands out. The show is created by, written by, and starsPamela Adlon. She plays Sam Fox, the single mother of three daughters modeled after her own reality-show-ready experience raising three girls in Los Angeles following a divorce. Sam is also, like Adlon, a working actress — on shows both raunchy, a la Californication, and animated for children, like her role on Recess. It’s a refreshingly blunt take on single motherhood without sacrificing the warmth of parental love, portraying the dance between selfishness and selflessness that’s at the heart of being a parent — especially one weathering the hormonal fireworks of a household of four women at different ages.

  • David Wiegand

    The fall TV season doesn’t count as much as it used to — we already know that. But no matter how many retreads the broadcast networks throw at viewers in the next few months, this fall will be memorable because of the premiere of Atlanta on Tuesday, Sept. 6, on FX. The half-hour comedy created by and starring Donald Glover (Community), simply and brilliantly recalibrates our expectations of what a TV comedy is and how black lives are portrayed on the medium.

  • Louisa Ada Seltzer

    The second reboot of the 1980s John Candy movie Uncle Buck, bumped by ABC from midseason, has the same tired jokes you'll find on any second-rate sitcom. Too bad, because Mike Epps is appealing and ABC would be wise to keep him around for future shows, but there’s just not enough to this show to suggest it will last past summer. It also airs against NBC’s America’s Got Talent, summer’s No. 1 program on broadcast, which may make it even harder to find an audience.

  • Neil Genzlinger

    Bryan Cranston brings his Tony Award-winning interpretation of President Lyndon B. Johnson to television in an adaptation of the Robert Schenkkan play All the Way, and it’s still quite a sight to behold, just as it was on Broadway in 2014. Nothing beats witnessing this kind of larger-than-life portrayal onstage, of course. But the television version, presented by HBO, offers plenty of rewards, allowing Cranston to work the close-ups and liberating him from the confines of a theater set. Cranston’s performance is a gem — in his hands, this accidental president comes across as an amazing bundle of contradictions, someone who seems at once too vulgar for the job and just right for it.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad