Sinclair Giving Up 3 Stations To Appease FCC

The three stations — WCIV Charleston and WCFT-WJSU Birmingham — are now owned by Allbritton Communications, which Sinclair is buying, and were to be operated by sidecar companies. But those plans were dashed when the FCC earlier this year cracked down on the use of JSAs and SSAs. Today's action, Sinclair said, is designed to win speedy approval of the Allbritton deal.

Sinclair Broadcast Group on Thursday announced that it was surrendering its licenses for three stations in Charleston, S.C., and Birmingham, Ala., having failed to find a buyer for them.

Sinclair said it was making the move to win speedy FCC approval of its deal to buy Allbritton Communications. That deal could unravel if the approval doesn't come by July 28.

Story continues after the ad

The three stations — WCIV Charleston and WCFT-WJSU Birmingham — are now owned by Allbritton.

Sinclair's original intention was to operate the three stations through sidecar companies and joint and shared services agreements.

But those plans were dashed when the FCC earlier this year cracked down on the use of JSAs and SSAs to circumvent local ownership rules in markets as small as Charleston (DMA 95) and Birmingham (DMA 45).

The three stations are ABC affiliates. But Sinclair is not giving up the ABC affiliations. Instead, it told the FCC, it will move the stations' ABC programming along with synidcation and news programming to multicast channels of the MNT affiliates Sinclair owns in Birmingham and Charleston -- WABM and WMMP, respectively.

Brand Connections

Sinclair General Counsel Barry Faber told TVNewsCheck that Sinclair decided to use WABM and WMMP as the ABC outlets because their broadcast facilities are better than those of the Allbritton stations.

The two Republican FCC commissioners — Ajit Pai and Michael O'Reilly — seized upon the announcement to scold the Democratic majority for its JSA-SSA action, saying that it confirmed their warning that the action would lead to less diversity, not more as intended.

"This will mean job losses, less service to South Carolinians and Alabamians, and less ownership diversity," they said. "We do not see how such an outcome possibly serves the public interest, and we hope that the commission will take action immediately to correct its misguided restrictions on JSAs."


Comments (17) -

CEOBOY711 Nickname posted over 2 years ago
How on earth does it mean less diversity?
Toby Williams Nickname posted over 2 years ago
"now owned by Allbritton". Don't you mean "currently owned"? Also, what's going to happen to WCIV and WCFT-WJSU when they lose their programming? They're not going off the air, are they?
Toby Williams Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Never mind.
FlashFlood Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Maybe those stations can affiliate with other networks or other program services.
Comment Removed
Comment removed by moderator
Insider Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Another 867 word manifesto. Considering the nutcase that killed the UCSB students was 107,000 words / 147 pages long, your manifesto should be ready any day now. Unfortunately, the UCSB nutcase was saner than you.
Toby Williams Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Beat it James Cieloha. Why aren't you banned yet?
EricPost Nickname posted over 2 years ago
This shows what I've said all along, there is TOO MUCH product. If they can't find a buyer, it means that the market cannot handle it. Let someone who can make use of the bandwidth use it. In fact, it shows TV stations SHOULD be consolidating their signals as FCC has proposed.
BemusedReader Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Well, yes... the Market SHOULD be allowed to handle it. But there's a slight problem: The FCC won't allow the Market to handle it. Because the only likely buyers of those stations would have been existing owners within those same markets. But the FCC won't even countenance a review of duopoly rules, which distort the market.
Chuck Nickname posted over 2 years ago
It will be a loss of signal. If ABC is moved to a .2 position it will no longer be in HDTV with the quality it is now. Our local CW affiliate is there, but if we watch a CW program it is from a more distant station which has it on their .1 channel. The sub-channels are great for things like AntennaTV, MeTV, Cozi, etc. where most programs were not produced in high definition and many are in black and white. There is not too much product out there for those of us who use antennas. There are hundreds of payTV channels and only 2-3 dozen OTA choices. The loss of stations is a loss to us and gives us less diversity. Fortunately, there are more choices now due to the new sub-channels networks, but Sinclair is eliminating competition by grouping them this way. Might as well be watching cable HD with an inferior signal.
Chuck Nickname posted over 2 years ago
This should make the FCC happy as it leads them closer to their goal of destroying antenna television. We "cut the cord" several years ago and don't want to go back.
SalesGrrl Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Well, now they can sell those TV stations to a minority owner! There must be tons of them, eagerly waiting for their chance to own a TV station, judging by what everyone whines about. Or perhaps some good quality local programming, independent of any big scary network that doesn't care about viewers, will replace the affiliates. *turns off sarcasm button* What this really means is that no one with the money to buy a station wants to jeopardize their own holdings with a purchase right now. And those companies that are snapping up low power stations for the auction don't think they'll make money on those stations for sale by Sinclair come auction time.
FederalGuy Nickname posted over 2 years ago
What this really means is Sinclair is backing the FCC into a corner to get the Albritton purchase approved, no loss of programming, sub-channels can be in HD (ABC uses 720p), and no barriers for FCC to point to as excuse for not approving. Plus, Sinclair makes Broadcasters point that scale is needed to survive.
David Schutz Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Channel sharing by two major networks might preclude some future mobile application options upon deployment of ATSC 3.0
SAD22 Nickname posted over 2 years ago
I cannot believe I'm reading this. Bad for the business, and just overall bad for business in this country. Very sad.
FlashFlood Nickname posted over 2 years ago
I expect that when WABM and WMMP begin their affiliation with ABC that they will put ABC on .1 and move MNT to their .2 subchannels.
Insider Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Thats a sure bet. They only said they would move them to their multicast channel, not their .2 channel.
Marketshare Blog Playout Blog




Overnights, adults 18-49 for September 28, 2016
  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
Source: Nielsen


  • Rob Owen

    Easily fall’s best broadcast network comedy pilot, NBC’s The Good Place offers a clever high-concept premise that’s complemented with intelligent, sometimes absurdist humor. Created by Michael Schur, co-creator of NBC’s Parks and Recreation, The Good Place is a highly serialized series that’s essentially set in heaven and stars Kristen Bell and Ted Danson. NBC made five episodes of The Good Place available for review, and the show not only holds up, but also it improves, deepening characters that initially feel one-note and frequently leaving viewers guessing with cliffhanger endings to many of the episodes. The combination of snappy dialogue and winning but flawed characters makes The Good Place a great bet for fans of smart TV comedy.

  • Maureen Ryan

    Pitch has swagger, for good reason. It gets the big things right; the Fox drama about the first female baseball player in the Major Leagues is one of the year’s most assured and exciting debuts. But part of what impresses about the pilot is also the way it confidently strings together so many small but telling details. Ginny (Kylie Bunbury) is the first woman to be called up from the minors to the big leagues, and no show since Friday Night Lights has done a better job of portraying the internal and external pressures that weigh heavily on young athletes asked to do much more than merely succeed on the field. Pitch will likely do a good job of getting viewers to root for it. The hope is that the show won’t be an impressive, short-lived curiosity, but rather a long-term phenomenon.

  • Kevin Fallon

    In a fall TV season that’s already making a splash for championing diverse, distinctive voices in an array of projects that they created, wrote, and starred in, Better Things on FX stands out. The show is created by, written by, and starsPamela Adlon. She plays Sam Fox, the single mother of three daughters modeled after her own reality-show-ready experience raising three girls in Los Angeles following a divorce. Sam is also, like Adlon, a working actress — on shows both raunchy, a la Californication, and animated for children, like her role on Recess. It’s a refreshingly blunt take on single motherhood without sacrificing the warmth of parental love, portraying the dance between selfishness and selflessness that’s at the heart of being a parent — especially one weathering the hormonal fireworks of a household of four women at different ages.

  • David Wiegand

    The fall TV season doesn’t count as much as it used to — we already know that. But no matter how many retreads the broadcast networks throw at viewers in the next few months, this fall will be memorable because of the premiere of Atlanta on Tuesday, Sept. 6, on FX. The half-hour comedy created by and starring Donald Glover (Community), simply and brilliantly recalibrates our expectations of what a TV comedy is and how black lives are portrayed on the medium.

  • Louisa Ada Seltzer

    The second reboot of the 1980s John Candy movie Uncle Buck, bumped by ABC from midseason, has the same tired jokes you'll find on any second-rate sitcom. Too bad, because Mike Epps is appealing and ABC would be wise to keep him around for future shows, but there’s just not enough to this show to suggest it will last past summer. It also airs against NBC’s America’s Got Talent, summer’s No. 1 program on broadcast, which may make it even harder to find an audience.

  • Neil Genzlinger

    Bryan Cranston brings his Tony Award-winning interpretation of President Lyndon B. Johnson to television in an adaptation of the Robert Schenkkan play All the Way, and it’s still quite a sight to behold, just as it was on Broadway in 2014. Nothing beats witnessing this kind of larger-than-life portrayal onstage, of course. But the television version, presented by HBO, offers plenty of rewards, allowing Cranston to work the close-ups and liberating him from the confines of a theater set. Cranston’s performance is a gem — in his hands, this accidental president comes across as an amazing bundle of contradictions, someone who seems at once too vulgar for the job and just right for it.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad