PTC Ranks Explict, Violent Show Sponsors

Parents Television Council President Tim Winter: “Today we call for greater responsibility by the corporations whose media dollars underwrite some of the most harmful material on broadcast television. These companies have sponsored programs that routinely deliver explicit content.”

The Parents Television Council today ranked the “Top Sponsors of Sexual Content, Suggestive Dialogue, Foul Language and Violence,” which feature the companies most closely associated with some of what the watchdog group calls “most offensive content on broadcast television.”

“Today we call for greater responsibility by the corporations whose media dollars underwrite some of the most harmful material on broadcast television,” said PTC President Tim Winter. “These companies have sponsored programs that routinely deliver explicit content such as jokes about incest, rape, pedophilia; glorify adultery; barrages of bleeped and partially-bleeped F-words; and intense, brutal violence, including cannibalism and fetishized butchery.”

Winter continued: “Corporate advertisers will be in New York City this week to begin negotiating their upfront advertising commitments to the broadcast networks. Beyond just attempting to reach a desired viewer demographic, both client and agency buyers should weigh carefully whether continued association with this kind of content will help or hurt their brands. Research conducted by the Association of National Advertisers found that when companies perceived to be family-oriented advertise on programs with explicit content, their brand equity can be hurt by as much as 30% when compared to advertising on family-oriented programs. We are asking these companies to reconsider the direction of their media spending and instead sponsor more family-oriented programming.

Story continues after the ad

“The companies on our lists are the worst offenders in each category, and McDonalds, YUM! Brands, and Toyota Motor Sales Inc., in particular have been the top contributors to the most explicit broadcast TV shows.

“Particularly jarring,”Winter said, “is the direction that McDonald’s advertising has taken in recent years, given its history as a family — and child-centric — brand. We’ve recently reached out to McDonald’s to encourage the company to change course, as it used to be one of our ‘best’ advertisers. And perhaps not coincidentally, data shows the company to have had better earnings when it eschewed explicit TV programming.

“Family quality programming doesn’t just benefit families. It is also more profitable for the corporate sponsors who advertise on the broadcast networks. We hope that companies will choose wisely where to put their ad dollars for the benefit of families across this country,” Winter added.

Background: PTC says the following lists feature companies that "most frequently sponsor some of the most offensive content on broadcast television," programs that have been evaluated and reviewed by the Parents Television Council’s Research Department.

Brand Connections

TV sexual content was broken into two categories: Sexual Content, which included depictions of or implied sexual content, and Suggestive Dialogue, which specifically included dialogue about sexual content.

Sexual Content

  1. McDonald’s Corp.
  2. YUM! Brands
  3. Mars Inc.
  4. Colgate Palmolive Co.
  5. Virgin Mobile Telecoms
  6. Time Warner Inc.
  7. Sony Corp. of America
  8. Toyota Motor Sales
  9. Samsung Electronics America
  10. Red Bull North America

Suggestive Dialogue

  1. McDonald’s Corp.
  2. Subway Restaurants
  3. Target Corp.
  4. Kohl's Corporation
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
  6. Unilever United States
  7. AT&T Corp.
  8. Verizon Communications
  9. Toyota Motor Sales
  10. Microsoft

Foul Language

  1. McDonald’s Corp.
  2. YUM! Brands
  3. L'Oreal USA
  4. Verizon Communications
  5. Toyota Motor Sales
  6. Cablevision Systems
  7. Signet Group plc (Kay Jewelers)
  8. Capital One Financial Corp.
  9. H & R Block
  10. Hyundai


  1. Subway Restaurants
  2. YUM! Brands
  3. Verizon Communications
  4. AT&T Corp.
  5. Sprint Corporation
  6. Burlington Industries
  7. Daimler Chrysler
  8. Toyota Motor Sales
  9. General Motors Corp.
  10. Signet Group plc (Kay Jewelers)


Comments (5) -

Roger O. Thornhill Nickname posted over 4 years ago
Tim Winter needs to get himself a real job; longshoreman, perhaps. As it is, the folks at the PTC have way too much time on their hands.
BemusedReader Nickname posted over 4 years ago
This is the Winter of our discontent. Hey, I guess if Tim really gets angry at all this perceived TV filth, he becomes "nuclear Winter"....?
FreeRightsUSA Nickname posted over 4 years ago
Hey PTC, if there is something you don't want to watch on TV, don't watch it. Just keep your own values ot yourselves and not foreced on the rest of us. At the end of the day, you can be your own censor, just let me make the decisions right for myself. Change the channel.
Insider Nickname posted over 4 years ago
As Cablevision is on this list, it is obvious the list was compiled off of NYC TV, which means the list might be different on a true National Scale, fwiw. I know McDonalds has been running a split 15 for Buy One Get One Free Big Macs in NYC with huge local tonnage - and isn't it interesting that that showed up at the top of most lists. Considering the top 2 on all lists are fast foods, its clear McDonalds was purely being competitive.
HopeUMakeit Nickname posted over 4 years ago
the creatives are just running out of reasons to honorably shoot people. for entertainment.
Marketshare Blog Playout Blog




Overnights, adults 18-49 for June 18, 2018
  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
Source: Nielsen


  • Hank Stuever

    In 1977, DC Comics unveiled a superhero named Black Lightning, hoping to fill an obvious void with a token character who, inspired somewhat by the characters in blaxploitation cinema, exhibited a lot of street sense on the blighted side of Metropolis. Black Lightning, a wholehearted and energetic live-action revival of the character on CW. It is a fine example of what television might look like once we move past the more ceremonial aspects of diversity. This is a black show on a network filled with white superheroes, and it displays no insecurity or self-consciousness about that.

  • Alexis Soloski

    In Amazon's Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, the creator of Gilmore Girls introduces another brainy, mouthy heroine, this time in the male-dominated comedy world of the 1950s.

  • Hal Boedeker

    A reassuring example of older means getting better, Will & Grace struts back to NBC bolder, brassier and bawdier. Some like it tart, and this frisky frolic delivers. After eight seasons, the beloved sitcom felt faded at its fade-out in 2006. Eleven years later, the revival packs a joyous kick in the first three episodes. Here is an absolutely fabulous return with four irrepressible stars who are at their very best. Will & Grace is no gay dinosaur.

  • Matt Zoller Seitz

    Wonderstruck, overstuffed, corny and stirring, Star Trek: Discovery stands tall alongside the best-regarded incarnations of the Trek franchise even as it raids elements from all of them (including the recent J.J. Abrams film series, which Paramount says is set in an alternate timeline that has nothing to do with this one). Though handsomely produced, the show’s imagination seems to have been slightly reined in by commercial mandates — namely, reinvigorating Trek as a TV property and serving as a marquee title that would lure customers to CBS All Access, the network’s subscription-only service.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad