Open Mike By John S. Sanders

Kill Newspaper-TV Crossownership Rule, Now

At a time when the traditional media is under profound economic, technological and competitive pressure, television stations and, to a greater degree, newspapers need more room to breathe, not less. Repealing the crossownership restriction would be an important step in this process.

Since 1975, the FCC’s restriction on owning a television station and a newspaper in the same market has generated considerable debate in Washington — ranging from a slow simmer to white hot depending upon the state of the economy; the pace of the merger and acquisition market; and the growing number of media outlets. Last November, the FCC proposed relaxing the crossownership regulations in the 20 largest markets, feeding fresh fuel to the controversy.

One side of the debate, espoused most vocally by a number of public interest groups and former FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, states that newspaper-television crossownership threatens the diversity of voices and reduces journalistic quality. They further argue that such crossownership may diminish localism, result in layoffs of news staff and simply pump up the profit margins of media conglomerates. There is a concern, this argument goes, that relaxation of the crossownership rule will simply ignite another wave of media consolidation to the detriment of local consumers.

Story continues after the ad

The opposing view, articulated by industry participants like Tribune (which is periodically required to petition for a waiver in its crossownership markets) and several trade associations, is that in a world with hundreds of cable channels, Internet sites, blogs and satellite services that did not exist in 1975, the threat to diversity posed by newspaper-television crossownership — if it ever existed at all — has completely evaporated. They point to studies demonstrating that co-owned print and television outlets in the same market often take opposing views regarding community issues, and that combining resources greatly enhances the ability to produce quality, in-depth investigative reporting.

Additionally, with television stations and especially newspapers buffeted by the forces of new technologies, increased competition, and a protracted economic recession, proponents of relaxing the regulations argue that the liberalization would be far from a quick fix to inflate profits, but rather a rational opportunity that might give some television stations and many newspapers the opportunity to simply survive.

One way of evaluating this debate is to look at how the permitted crossownership situations have fared over the years. The first point of view is seriously undermined because a large proportion of the legacy newspaper-television crossownership operations have not survived.

I have identified the 26 crossownership situations that reportedly existed in 2001. (Surprisingly, the FCC, despite the high profile of this issue, does not supply a definitive list of just how many grandfathered and waivered crossownership situations exist today; nor do the primary trade associations representing the newspaper and broadcasting industries.)  Strikingly, eight of the 26 crossownership situations, almost one-third of the 2001 total, have perished for one reason or another over the years, which is hardly symptomatic of an arrangement that produces either extraordinary influence or extraordinary profits. This attrition cuts across markets of all sizes. (See chart at end of story.)

Brand Connections

In New York, Tribune, owner of WPIX, sold Newsday to Cablevision in 2008, just as the nation was sliding into recession, for $650 million. (This also raises questions as to why a cable system with 3 million subscribers and a local news operation is not subject to crossownership regulation but a television station is, whether it carries news or not.)  Belo Corp, which owned WFAA and the Dallas Morning News, was divided into two separate publicly-traded entities in 2008. Media General has announced that The Tampa Tribune is for sale, effectively ending the crossownership in the same market. In Cincinnati, the Cincinnati Post simply went out of business in 2007, despite its co-ownership with WCPO.

The attrition has been no less profound in smaller markets. This year, Media General sold The Bristol Herald Courier in the Tri-Cities, Tenn.-Va., DMA, as part of a group newspaper sale to Berkshire Hathaway, despite co-ownership with WJHL in that market. Frank Mayborn Enterprises sold KCEN in Waco, Texas, to London Broadcasting in 2009 even though it enjoyed a grandfathered crossownership with The Temple Daily Telegram.

In the Columbus-Tupelo-West Point, Miss., DMA, the Imes family sold WCBJ to Morris Media in 2003 even though it also owned The Commercial Dispatch. In Idaho Falls-Pocatello, the Post Company sold KIFI to the News-Press in 2005, terminating the grandfathered co-ownership with The Post Herald.

The destruction of almost one-third of the legacy crossownerships leads to some interesting conclusions:

  • Ownership of both a newspaper and a television station in the same market is no guarantee of financial survival, much less extraordinary profits or market power.
  • The “iron fist of the marketplace,” by incentivizing operators to either divest holdings or terminate them, appears to be much more effective at ordering the competitive landscape than regulations do.
  • That the regulations even exist is somewhat mystifying — restrictive regulations typically exist to control economic arrangements that are growing to create unfair market power, not those which seem to be in a process of self-destruction.

This is not to say that the crossownership concept is totally undermined, just that it is not so easy. Market managers at companies with both television and newspaper interests, as well as associated Web platforms, indicate that with careful planning and management, they have been able to add low single digit percentages to revenue growth and to reduce expenses by low single digits as well. This is hardly a windfall, but possibly enough to maintain the viability of both media in some markets.


Comments (4) -

David Schutz Nickname posted over 4 years ago
John, I commend you for your well reasoned, and much needed research into this topic. It is clear that the media concentration concerns that prompted the original FCC rule in 1975, have virtually disappeared today. The proliferation of new local news sources, combined with the dramatic decline in daily newspaper penetration, are all proof that the regulation is no longer relevant.
SouthBeach Nickname posted over 4 years ago
A few years ago it was a "given" that the synergies between a newspaper and a TV station would be powerful. That has not proven to be the case. In light of that, let's just consider the waivers a test case and decide that there really is no need for a cross ownership ban. It's almost like "who cares ?"!
GetReal Nickname posted over 4 years ago
Had it not been for the nearly total collapse of newspapers, the idea of banning cross ownership would still make sense. Now, it doesn't . Broadcasters are the only life-saver out there. That wasn't always the case. In the 70s and 80s, and most of the 90s, local papers and local stations were doing quite well. On one hand, broadcasters say that there are so many competitors that lots of voices and viable local ad venues that cross-ownership rules aren't necessary. On the other hand, broadcasters point out that in most local markets, stations still capture about as many viewers as cable, which is why, justifiably, advertisers still advertise to the extent they do.
inquiringmind Nickname posted over 4 years ago
It seems to me that whenever a TV station combines ownership with a newspaper in a market...the other tv stations are at a disadvantage. If doing away with cross ownership restrictions is another way of helping newspaper ownership put a greater economy of operating the newspaper, who needs that? Newspapers will adapt, as they have done already, and TV stations will adapt. Combination is not always the answer. From what I've seen of a property operating too many broadcast channels and too many web just cheapens the ad rates. That may be well and good, and the public is served and the advertisers are served, and the operators are served. But let's not "save" newspapers" in the process. They have had a very high share of the ad revenue for a long time. This is a natural evolvement that is underway...newspaper declining readership and revenues. There was a time 30 years ago when a strong local TV broadcast affil could do a double digit HH rating for a prime rotator in the July book (and that is "rating" as I did not mean to say "share') and double digit ratings are hard to come by now...even double digit shares. But TV works at operating with economy while continuing to serve the public. Newspapers are doing the same.
Marketshare Blog Playout Blog




Overnights, adults 18-49 for September 28, 2016
  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
Source: Nielsen


  • Rob Owen

    Easily fall’s best broadcast network comedy pilot, NBC’s The Good Place offers a clever high-concept premise that’s complemented with intelligent, sometimes absurdist humor. Created by Michael Schur, co-creator of NBC’s Parks and Recreation, The Good Place is a highly serialized series that’s essentially set in heaven and stars Kristen Bell and Ted Danson. NBC made five episodes of The Good Place available for review, and the show not only holds up, but also it improves, deepening characters that initially feel one-note and frequently leaving viewers guessing with cliffhanger endings to many of the episodes. The combination of snappy dialogue and winning but flawed characters makes The Good Place a great bet for fans of smart TV comedy.

  • Maureen Ryan

    Pitch has swagger, for good reason. It gets the big things right; the Fox drama about the first female baseball player in the Major Leagues is one of the year’s most assured and exciting debuts. But part of what impresses about the pilot is also the way it confidently strings together so many small but telling details. Ginny (Kylie Bunbury) is the first woman to be called up from the minors to the big leagues, and no show since Friday Night Lights has done a better job of portraying the internal and external pressures that weigh heavily on young athletes asked to do much more than merely succeed on the field. Pitch will likely do a good job of getting viewers to root for it. The hope is that the show won’t be an impressive, short-lived curiosity, but rather a long-term phenomenon.

  • Kevin Fallon

    In a fall TV season that’s already making a splash for championing diverse, distinctive voices in an array of projects that they created, wrote, and starred in, Better Things on FX stands out. The show is created by, written by, and starsPamela Adlon. She plays Sam Fox, the single mother of three daughters modeled after her own reality-show-ready experience raising three girls in Los Angeles following a divorce. Sam is also, like Adlon, a working actress — on shows both raunchy, a la Californication, and animated for children, like her role on Recess. It’s a refreshingly blunt take on single motherhood without sacrificing the warmth of parental love, portraying the dance between selfishness and selflessness that’s at the heart of being a parent — especially one weathering the hormonal fireworks of a household of four women at different ages.

  • David Wiegand

    The fall TV season doesn’t count as much as it used to — we already know that. But no matter how many retreads the broadcast networks throw at viewers in the next few months, this fall will be memorable because of the premiere of Atlanta on Tuesday, Sept. 6, on FX. The half-hour comedy created by and starring Donald Glover (Community), simply and brilliantly recalibrates our expectations of what a TV comedy is and how black lives are portrayed on the medium.

  • Louisa Ada Seltzer

    The second reboot of the 1980s John Candy movie Uncle Buck, bumped by ABC from midseason, has the same tired jokes you'll find on any second-rate sitcom. Too bad, because Mike Epps is appealing and ABC would be wise to keep him around for future shows, but there’s just not enough to this show to suggest it will last past summer. It also airs against NBC’s America’s Got Talent, summer’s No. 1 program on broadcast, which may make it even harder to find an audience.

  • Neil Genzlinger

    Bryan Cranston brings his Tony Award-winning interpretation of President Lyndon B. Johnson to television in an adaptation of the Robert Schenkkan play All the Way, and it’s still quite a sight to behold, just as it was on Broadway in 2014. Nothing beats witnessing this kind of larger-than-life portrayal onstage, of course. But the television version, presented by HBO, offers plenty of rewards, allowing Cranston to work the close-ups and liberating him from the confines of a theater set. Cranston’s performance is a gem — in his hands, this accidental president comes across as an amazing bundle of contradictions, someone who seems at once too vulgar for the job and just right for it.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad