Gannett Buying Thousands Of iPhones, iPads

An internal memo says the devices will be given to its newspaper staffs to “meet the demands of the new news cycle, one that requires agility in real-time reporting, social media and greater emphasis on video storytelling, further increasing our competitive advantage.”
TVNewsCheck,

A leaked memo from USA Today parent company Gannett Co. says the company has bought “thousands” of Apple iPhones and iPads for its newspapers. The devices will begin arriving in January, with training starting “several weeks later.”

The revelations were reported by Gannett Blog, a website not affiliated with the company. It posted a memo from Bob Dickey, Gannett’s U.S. newspaper division president.

Story continues after the ad

Some excerpts:

“Readers’ speedy adoption of new technology for news consumption creates new opportunities for us to uniquely serve them. To do so, we must ensure our journalists are equipped and trained on the tools to work in new ways.

“We’re excited to announce a significant investment in our newsgathering tools. This week, we have purchased thousands of new devices for many of our journalists. These include:

“In every local market, we have the most and the best journalists. These new tools will help our journalists meet the demands of the new news cycle, one that requires agility in real-time reporting, social media and greater emphasis on video storytelling, further increasing our competitive advantage.

“Taken together, the tools and training should not only make our journalists more effective at their existing work, but also enable them to do new things we can’t even imagine yet.”

Read the Gannett Blog story here.

Edit Article

Tags

Comments (6) -

PhillyPhlash Nickname posted 5 months ago
Can't wait to see reporters try to write stories on the simulated keyboard. Why not just supply staffers with a decent laptop or even netbook? This is called taking "trendy" to absurd lengths.
Nugacious1 Nickname posted 5 months ago
I'm guessing reporters are going to start using the front and rear facing cameras to do live shots over 3G networks. Might look a bit subpar but it will be cheap-cheaper than sending a reporter, photog and microwave gear.
PhillyPhlash Nickname posted 5 months ago
Story is about newspapers, not TV, and newspapers into video who don't use gear, and people, capable of delivering professional video will suffer the consequences of a dissatisfied audience.
EricPost Nickname posted 5 months ago
American's consistently have said, with their pocketbooks we want quantity and convenience over quality. MP3s, cellphones and such are vastly inferior to CDs and landlines, but not so much inferior that consumers don't prefer them. Americans want coverage NOW on bad cameras, rather than great HD coverage later. After all a picture is a picture, is the event anymore newsworthy if you can see the blood on a guy's face in clear HD. Content is what really matters
PhillyPhlash Nickname posted 5 months ago
Think about the absurdity of what you're saying the next time you watch the beautifully composed and lit video of 60 Minutes in high definition.
Ted Langdell posted 5 months ago
Newspapers are trying to move their coverage over to the 21st century version of paper. And to present the coverage in the way they believe consumers consume it. IE: Offer soup in a bowl with a spoon. Since the coverage is consumed on the web or small-screen devices, the picture quality doesn't need to have as many pixels ad HD TV to be useful to the consumer. TV stations routinely put cell-phone or iPhone video on the air live via SKYPE, iChat or other means... and I expect newspaper operated "new-paper" systems to use the tech in as many ways as it can be used. They're trying to stay in business... which does mean jobs for people.

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2778.79 -34.90 (-1.24%)
NYSE 7427.74 -52.69 (-0.70%)
S&P 500 1295.22 -9.64 (-0.74%)
Updated 05/21 8:54a ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for May 17, 2012
  • 1.
    3.0/9
  • 2.
    2.5/7
  • 3.
    2.4/7
  • 4.
    1.5/4
  • 5.
    1.1/3
  • 6.
    0.3/1
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • David Wiegand

    Fans of Sex and the City have finally gotten their wish: Their beloved sex-focused sitcom is back on the air ... sort of. The four women have become four men, of course, and the writing isn't as good. Oh, and the laugh track so annoying, it's offensive. And did I mention that the costumes would be considered fashionable if you were holding a yard sale? Men at Work on TBS is almost quaint, it's so old fashioned. If it had any meat on its bones, you'd be tempted to say it's the sadly ignoble epitome of TV's long-festering emasculated-men syndrome. But it's so much of a big, forgettable, innocuous shrug, it's not even worth any actual vitriol.

  • Mike Hale

    The USA Network's motto is "Characters Welcome." Apparently they're especially welcome if they resemble Oscar Madison and Felix Unger. Already stocked with Odd Couple knockoffs in Psych and White Collar, USA adds to its inventory Common Law, another comic crime-fighting show about mismatched partners. But this latest entry exhibits very little of that kind of spark as it tries to wring laughs from the juxtaposition of counseling and police work. It looks too flat and schematically plotted to succeed as the type of lightweight summer fun we’ve come to expect from USA.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Johnny Carson: Fantastic entertainer, miserable human being. That's the lasting message of Johnny Carson: King of Late Night, the new PBS American Masters film, a rich history of a rare product of television who dominated the small screen for decades. Unprecedented access to personal archives plus all existing episodes of The Tonight Show (1962-92), distinguishes this film by Peter Jones. Telling interviews with family and colleagues, including second wife Joanne Carson, former Tonight Show executive producer Peter Lassally and a number of biographers sharpen the picture. The clips are carefully selected to illustrate specific personality traits, the performance highlights are given context and meaning beyond funny lines and memorable moments.

  • Hank Stuever

    AMC's The Pitch is a sharply-made if slightly off-putting reality series that follows different advertising agencies each week as they compete for new accounts. The inspiration for the show — made clear by its own ad campaign — is to harness some of the verve generated by the network's acclaimed Mad Men. The Pitch has a way of making the ad world seem like a real downer — a repugnant exercise in egotism laced with depressing bouts of creative compromise.

  • Tim Goodman

    HBO's Veep stars Julia Louis-Dreyfus as former Sen. Selina Meyer, who accepts the vice presidential duty and regrets it almost immediately: She has no real power and gets muscled by the Senate, Congress and the (so-far-unseen) president, who delegates all the truly crappy jobs to her. Louis-Dreyfus has found perhaps her best post-Seinfeld role and takes to it with such fervor — the constant swearing, the barely veiled desire to become president, the unhappy give-and-take with other politicians and a delightful disdain for average citizens — that you can't help but applaud what is clearly an Emmy-worthy effort. Her work alone makes Veep a gem, but there's even more to like.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad