Jessell At Large

Broadcasting Wins Big With NFL Deals

The contract renewals of NBC, CBS and Fox preserve for another nine years the mutually prosperous relationship between pro football and TV broadcasting. The extensions send a wonderful message about broadcasting and the network-affiliate partnership at the heart of it. They say that broadcasting is here to stay and will continue to be the dominant television medium. And it's all thanks to retransmission consent. Let's hope the FCC doesn't mess that up.
TVNewsCheck,

"The thing that I am most proud of ... is that we will continue to be on free television," NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell told reporters Wednesday following news that the league had signed new TV rights extensions with NBC, CBS and Fox. "I think it's great for fans. It will continue to allow us to grow our audience."

The deals preserve for another nine years the mutually prosperous relationship between pro football and TV broadcasting that really got going in 1958 when NBC enthralled America with its broadcast of the NFL Championship. Fullback Alan Ameche won the game for the Baltimore Colts with a two-yard plunge into the end zone in sudden death overtime. Mercifully for the local New York Giants' faithful, the telecast was blacked out in New York.

Story continues after the ad

It's been called the Greatest Game Ever Played, and it may have been — up to Dec. 28, 1958. But there have been many other televised thrillers since and every fan has his or her favorite. I go with the Immaculate Reception or John Riggins' fourth-and-one dash in Super Bowl XVII. The memorable moments keep piling up. Did you happen to see the Rev. Tebow's lastest fourth-quarter comeback against the Bears on Sunday?

Now we know the long and happy tradition will continue at least until 2022. That's when the new nine-year extensions are set to end. (There are still two seasons remaining on the current contracts.)

Without doubt, the NFL is the biggest programming prize in television. Each week, the games attract huge numbers of people in the primes of their product-consuming lives. Last week, NBC's Sunday Night Football was TV's No. 1 show. Nothing else was close. And fans tend to watch football live, commercials and all. If they use DVRs, its only so they can watch the game (and a lot of the commercials) a second of third time.

The Super Bowls are cultural phenomena, drawing tens of millions of viewers even when the games are lousy. And lately the games have been anything but lousy.

“The product is so important, and it’s such a foundation for CBS that the longer we can lock it up, the better it is for us," CBS Sports Chairman Sean McManus told the New York Times.

This kind of programming doesn't come cheap. Under the new deals, the networks combined will pay on average a little more than $3 billion a year for pretty much the same packages. CBS and Fox get the Sunday regional games, NBC gets Sunday nights and they all take turns with the Super Bowl. The $3 billion-plus translates to more than a 50% increase over what the networks are paying now.

The extensions send a wonderful message about broadcasting and the network-affiliate partnership at the heart of it. They say that broadcasting is here to stay and will continue to be the dominant television medium. It's not going to be cable or satellite or streaming or mobile apps or anything else the technologists conjure up over the next decade. It's going to be broadcasting — the biggest media stage of all.

To me, the message is loud and clear. But not everybody seems to hear it. The current FCC, for instance, is driving a spectrum policy that treats broadcasting as if it were an artifact of a bygone era, something to be tolerated and then gently led into the home of forgotten media with 45s and eight-track players.

Unlike FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, Goodell, I think, sees that the over-the-air element of TV broadcasting is not incidental, but central. It means that everybody everywhere gets to watch the home team free or charge and build a lifetime of loyalty. Check that Goodell quote up top again: "It will continue to allow us to grow our audience."

Wall Street investors also seem to be deaf to the power of broadcasting. Perhaps mesmerized by the gadgetry of Silicon Valley and uncertain about the steadiness of the retransmission consent revenue stream, they have been eschewing the pure plays and devaluing companies with large broadcasting components.

“For 30 years, we’ve been reading about the possible demise of broadcasting," said NAB spokesman Dennis Wharton. "They were wrong then, and they’re wrong now."

That broadcasting is still in the game is due to retransmission consent. It's has given the TV the wherewithal to compete with cable networks that have always enjoyed the dual revenue stream — advertising and programming fees from operators.

In 1992, Congress granted TV stations the power to stop cable operators from retransmitting their programming without permission — that is, without compensation. It was slow coming, but broadcasters collectively are now getting more than a billion dollars a year in retransmission consent revenue.

Affiliates haven't much liked the idea of sharing their hard-earned retrans dollars with the networks. But they really can't complain much now. They can see where the money is being spent. Strong networks make strong affiliates.

Edit Article

Tags

Comments (11) -

TVfan57 Nickname posted 5 months ago
This was a win-win for Broadcast TV and the NFL. The price is enormous as are the ratings. Broadcast is good for the NFL and the NFL is good for Broadcast. The real winner is the fans as they will be able to watch Sunday NFL football for free for another decade. Thanks to both the NFL and the Networks.
TVEng Nickname posted 5 months ago
Too bad you can't say the same for MLB & the NBA.
Sammy Nickname posted 5 months ago
Paging Matt Polka. Matt Polka to the white courtesy phone please.
Terry Heaton posted 5 months ago
Free, Harry? Really? Who pays for retrans consent? We do. No such thing as free anymore. This is all spin.
newsbot Nickname posted 5 months ago
Quite right. Broadcasters will continue to pay extortionate rights fees - and pass them along to cable and satellite subscribers - until the FCC takes the retrans punch bowl away. And then what will happen? It doesn't take a genius to figure it out.
Sammy Nickname posted 5 months ago
And then what happens? Well if your fantasy were to come true all the sports would go to ESPN and cable bills would continue to rise.
newsbot Nickname posted 5 months ago
Don't get me wrong; I'm sympathetic to the broadcasters' plight with respect to runaway sports rights fees . But counting on the Genachowski FCC to share that sympathy when the Chairman has already demonstrated a pattern of hostility towards any use of spectrum that doesn't involve payoffs to the federal government and a monthly fee from subscribers is hopelessly naive.
Harry Jessell posted 5 months ago
Terry, it's free for the price of an antenna.
newsbot Nickname posted 5 months ago
Harry, you're missing the point. If it's free for the price of antenna while cable and satellite companies have to pay, there's a differential (and a fast-growing one) that may become untenable on Capitol Hill. Already there are rumblings to that effect as your article indicates. How long can broadcasters continue to justify this differential treatment as cable and satellite subscribers get more and more frustrated by the constant skirmishes at renewal time?
JohnnyHD Nickname posted 5 months ago
It becomes more "free" when you dump multi-channel providers.
JohnnyHD Nickname posted 5 months ago
If you were someone who offered a product for free to the public, wouldn't you be a little PO'ed if someone was taking it and repackaging it and selling it for a profit? If you don't like it - drop it (cable/sat). I had cable years ago back when channels had very little commercials. Now it's all reruns of Broadcast TV and a ton of commercials. These cable channels make money buy selling time & get paid from the multichannel providers. Broadcasters have a product as well "for free" - why should someone else be allowed to sell it and not be compensate the people who provide it? Sounds like stealing to me.

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2778.79 -34.90 (-1.24%)
NYSE 7427.74 -52.69 (-0.70%)
S&P 500 1295.22 -9.64 (-0.74%)
Updated 05/21 8:53a ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for May 17, 2012
  • 1.
    3.0/9
  • 2.
    2.5/7
  • 3.
    2.4/7
  • 4.
    1.5/4
  • 5.
    1.1/3
  • 6.
    0.3/1
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • David Wiegand

    Fans of Sex and the City have finally gotten their wish: Their beloved sex-focused sitcom is back on the air ... sort of. The four women have become four men, of course, and the writing isn't as good. Oh, and the laugh track so annoying, it's offensive. And did I mention that the costumes would be considered fashionable if you were holding a yard sale? Men at Work on TBS is almost quaint, it's so old fashioned. If it had any meat on its bones, you'd be tempted to say it's the sadly ignoble epitome of TV's long-festering emasculated-men syndrome. But it's so much of a big, forgettable, innocuous shrug, it's not even worth any actual vitriol.

  • Mike Hale

    The USA Network's motto is "Characters Welcome." Apparently they're especially welcome if they resemble Oscar Madison and Felix Unger. Already stocked with Odd Couple knockoffs in Psych and White Collar, USA adds to its inventory Common Law, another comic crime-fighting show about mismatched partners. But this latest entry exhibits very little of that kind of spark as it tries to wring laughs from the juxtaposition of counseling and police work. It looks too flat and schematically plotted to succeed as the type of lightweight summer fun we’ve come to expect from USA.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Johnny Carson: Fantastic entertainer, miserable human being. That's the lasting message of Johnny Carson: King of Late Night, the new PBS American Masters film, a rich history of a rare product of television who dominated the small screen for decades. Unprecedented access to personal archives plus all existing episodes of The Tonight Show (1962-92), distinguishes this film by Peter Jones. Telling interviews with family and colleagues, including second wife Joanne Carson, former Tonight Show executive producer Peter Lassally and a number of biographers sharpen the picture. The clips are carefully selected to illustrate specific personality traits, the performance highlights are given context and meaning beyond funny lines and memorable moments.

  • Hank Stuever

    AMC's The Pitch is a sharply-made if slightly off-putting reality series that follows different advertising agencies each week as they compete for new accounts. The inspiration for the show — made clear by its own ad campaign — is to harness some of the verve generated by the network's acclaimed Mad Men. The Pitch has a way of making the ad world seem like a real downer — a repugnant exercise in egotism laced with depressing bouts of creative compromise.

  • Tim Goodman

    HBO's Veep stars Julia Louis-Dreyfus as former Sen. Selina Meyer, who accepts the vice presidential duty and regrets it almost immediately: She has no real power and gets muscled by the Senate, Congress and the (so-far-unseen) president, who delegates all the truly crappy jobs to her. Louis-Dreyfus has found perhaps her best post-Seinfeld role and takes to it with such fervor — the constant swearing, the barely veiled desire to become president, the unhappy give-and-take with other politicians and a delightful disdain for average citizens — that you can't help but applaud what is clearly an Emmy-worthy effort. Her work alone makes Veep a gem, but there's even more to like.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad