Jessell At Large

Uncovering The Truth About Retrans Value

A new SNL Kagan report shows just how fat cable networks have become — more than 30 networks have margins of 50% or more topped by Nickelodeon, with a 64.6% margin and the Food Network at 60.5%. So, when your local cable operator gags on your asking $1 per sub per month  and says he can't afford anything close to that, show him the SNL Kagan report and point out that it isn't his neighborhood broadcasters who are getting rich off of his subscribers, but those remote cable networks that, by the way, only have a fraction of the audience that you have.
TVNewsCheck,

SNL Kagan has supplied some ammo for stations to take into their next retrans negotiations with cable and satellite operators. It's a report showing growth of the cash flow margins of cable networks, and it's the retrans equivalent of the Predator drone.

What it shows is just how fat cable networks have become. According to its research, more than 30 networks have margins of 50% or more topped by Nickelodeon, with a 64.6% margin and the Food Network at 60.5%.

Story continues after the ad

Next in line: NBCU's CNBC World and CNBC at 59.9% each; Viacom’s VH1 Classic at 59.3%; Discovery Communications’ TLC at 58.7%; The Disney Channel at 57.7%; Scripps’ HGTV at 57.1%; the Discovery Channel at 57%; and AMC Network's AMC at 55.4%.

The average margin of all cable networks in 2010 was 41%, which SNL researchers found "amazing, given the fact that there are a number of networks with negative cash flow margins and emerging networks with low margins in the mix.

"In addition, sports networks typically have lower cash flow margins than general entertainment and other genres," the reports says. "ESPN, for instance, which makes up almost 15% of industry revenue, has a cash flow margin of just 25.3%."

And the gilded gated community of cable's super rich is expanding. By 2015, the number of 50%-margin-plus networks will nearly double to 58, the report says. And there will be another 61 with margins between 40% and 50% and 32 in the 30%-40% range.

So, when your local cable operator gags on your asking $1 per sub per month (which is the least you should be getting) and says he can't afford anything close to that, show him the SNL Kagan report and point out that it isn't your neighborhood broadcasters who are getting rich off of his subscribers, but those remote cable networks that, by the way, only have a fraction of the audience that you have.

The reason that the cable networks can post such margins despite their paltry ratings is because cable and satellite operators mindlessly pay them programming fees that have no relation to the audiences they are delivering.

Tell the operators that instead of balking at your demands they should consider cutting back on the fees to Discovery and AMC and HGTV until their margins drop out of the stratosphere and down with your average TV station.

Station margins, you should stress, ain't what they used to be. According to John Sanders at Bond & Pecaro, my infallible source in these matters, Big Four network affiliates are still doing well, but only the best in the biggest market can manage a 50% cash-flow margin anymore.

Margins for affiliates in the top 20 markets averaged 42% in 2010 and they get smaller along with the market size. They shrink to 37% in DMAs 21-50, to 35% in DMAs 51-80, to 35% in DMAs 81-100 and to 34% in DMAs 101 and smaller.

And the trend is downward. Each of the 2010 averages is off three, four or five points from where they were in pre-recession 2006. (Over the same period, the average cash flow margin of cable networks grew at a compound annual rate of 3.5%).

Without the boost from political advertising, most pure-play publicly traded TV groups are reporting 2011 margins in the 30%-35% range, Sanders also notes.

Keep in mind the stations we are talking about here are full power with Big Four affiliations and regular newscasts. The averages are not being dragged down by second- and third-tier players like the cable averages are.

FCC officials should also take a look at the SNL Kagan report.

Claiming that broadcasters' retrans demands are putting upward pressure on subscriber rates, cable operators are trying to hobble broadcasters' ability to negotiate for fees by convincing the FCC to allow them to import affiliates from adjacent markets and to bar stations from combining locally through shared services agreements and other partnerships.

But the report shows who the real culprits behind rising cable bills are. To support their extraordinary margins, the networks will receive $26.8 billion in programming fees this year. The broadcasters, according to an earlier SNL Kagan report, will be getting only 5% as much — $1.47 billion.

In a way, I can't blame the operators for trying to target broadcasters at the FCC. Unable to say no to cable networks, it's about all they can do to curtail programming costs. The FCC doesn't have any authority to regulate what the cable networks charge.

In the meantime, broadcasters ought to arm themselves with a copy of the SNL Kagan report, The Economics of Basic Cable Networks, and be ready to fire away at the next retrans negotiating session.

 

Harry A. Jessell is editor of TVNewsCheck. He can be reached at 973-701-1067 or hajessell@newscheckmedia.com. You can read his other columns here.

Edit Article

Tags

Comments (5) -

paul greeley posted 6 months ago
|
This is one of the best, most factual and compelling arguments I've seen for broadcasters to show the cable companies. Why should little-watched cable channels like MTV get 2-3 dollars a month while major-viewed local stations have to fight for a buck? Paul Greeley
Kenn Baynard posted 6 months ago
|
Combine low retrans rates from providers with the broadcast networks demanding a slice of the tiny pie, and that leaves a lot of stations with negative retrans cash flow because some networks are asking for more than what they station is pulling in. This is putting a pinch on a lot of small stations that are barely scraping by as it is.
Thomas Scanlan posted 6 months ago
|
Stations with maximized technical facilities need to be ready to pull the trigger when cable systems balk at paying the stations additional retrans fees at renewal time. Spending time recently in several medium and major markets in the midwest and west, I have yet to see even ONE locally produced promotional announcement promoting the station's availability on an antenna!! Too many stations are way too lax at making their audience aware of their station's availability - probably at a higher resolution - using an antenna. This should be a MAJOR effort of every station's promotion department, and should run on its own air as well as on its website. Then, such stations will be well poised to tell the cable systems 'what they can do' when an impasse is reached!
David Schutz Nickname posted 6 months ago
|
The Major MSO's have significant ownership interests in several cable nets. Fees paid to their nets represent little more than; "a dollar going from the left pocket to the right pocket".
Mickie Nickname posted 6 months ago
|
To add to Mr. Jessel’s salient statements, here’s one that should get the broadcaster’s blood boiling. In all the 2010-2011 TV season, other than a few ESPN football games, there was not one cable program--let me repeat that--not 1 cable program--that appeared in the top 100 TV Programs. (Source: The Nielsen Company, 9/20/10-5/25/11; Programming under 25 min. excluded; Ranked by AA% (ratings); in the event of a tie, impressions (000’s) are used as a tiebreaker.)

Today's Top Stories

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2778.79 -34.90 (-1.24%)
NYSE 7427.74 -52.69 (-0.70%)
S&P 500 1295.22 -9.64 (-0.74%)
Updated 05/21 8:44a ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for May 17, 2012
  • 1.
    3.0/9
  • 2.
    2.5/7
  • 3.
    2.4/7
  • 4.
    1.5/4
  • 5.
    1.1/3
  • 6.
    0.3/1
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • David Wiegand

    Fans of Sex and the City have finally gotten their wish: Their beloved sex-focused sitcom is back on the air ... sort of. The four women have become four men, of course, and the writing isn't as good. Oh, and the laugh track so annoying, it's offensive. And did I mention that the costumes would be considered fashionable if you were holding a yard sale? Men at Work on TBS is almost quaint, it's so old fashioned. If it had any meat on its bones, you'd be tempted to say it's the sadly ignoble epitome of TV's long-festering emasculated-men syndrome. But it's so much of a big, forgettable, innocuous shrug, it's not even worth any actual vitriol.

  • Mike Hale

    The USA Network's motto is "Characters Welcome." Apparently they're especially welcome if they resemble Oscar Madison and Felix Unger. Already stocked with Odd Couple knockoffs in Psych and White Collar, USA adds to its inventory Common Law, another comic crime-fighting show about mismatched partners. But this latest entry exhibits very little of that kind of spark as it tries to wring laughs from the juxtaposition of counseling and police work. It looks too flat and schematically plotted to succeed as the type of lightweight summer fun we’ve come to expect from USA.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Johnny Carson: Fantastic entertainer, miserable human being. That's the lasting message of Johnny Carson: King of Late Night, the new PBS American Masters film, a rich history of a rare product of television who dominated the small screen for decades. Unprecedented access to personal archives plus all existing episodes of The Tonight Show (1962-92), distinguishes this film by Peter Jones. Telling interviews with family and colleagues, including second wife Joanne Carson, former Tonight Show executive producer Peter Lassally and a number of biographers sharpen the picture. The clips are carefully selected to illustrate specific personality traits, the performance highlights are given context and meaning beyond funny lines and memorable moments.

  • Hank Stuever

    AMC's The Pitch is a sharply-made if slightly off-putting reality series that follows different advertising agencies each week as they compete for new accounts. The inspiration for the show — made clear by its own ad campaign — is to harness some of the verve generated by the network's acclaimed Mad Men. The Pitch has a way of making the ad world seem like a real downer — a repugnant exercise in egotism laced with depressing bouts of creative compromise.

  • Tim Goodman

    HBO's Veep stars Julia Louis-Dreyfus as former Sen. Selina Meyer, who accepts the vice presidential duty and regrets it almost immediately: She has no real power and gets muscled by the Senate, Congress and the (so-far-unseen) president, who delegates all the truly crappy jobs to her. Louis-Dreyfus has found perhaps her best post-Seinfeld role and takes to it with such fervor — the constant swearing, the barely veiled desire to become president, the unhappy give-and-take with other politicians and a delightful disdain for average citizens — that you can't help but applaud what is clearly an Emmy-worthy effort. Her work alone makes Veep a gem, but there's even more to like.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad