Dingell Slams FCC For Non-Responsiveness

The congressman is ticked at Julius Genachowski, saying the FCC chairman hasn’t given him a “substantive response” to his questions about the proposed spectrum auctions.
TVNewsCheck,

Today, Congressman John D. Dingell (D-Mich.) sent a letter to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski rebuking him for failing to provide a substantive response to Dingell’s June 17 inquiry about voluntary incentive auctions of broadcaster spectrum.

In his Aug. 3 response, Dingell’s office said, “Chairman Genachowski failed to respond to Dingell’s detailed questions, instead writing that releasing information about the predictive model the Commission has used to predict the outcome of incentive auctions is still ‘very much a work in progress’ and would ‘potentially damage the commission’s deliberative processes.’ ”

Story continues after the ad

“I am deeply disturbed that an agency created by Congress so often and so willfully fails in its duty to respond in a substantive manner to Congressional requests for information,” said Dingell. “With respect to voluntary incentive auctions, it is imperative that members of Congress know what effect they will have on the broadcast industry and their constituents’ ability to receive free, over-the-air local programming.”

NAB President-CEO Gordon Smith issued a statement on the matter: "It is deeply disappointing that a member of Congress as distinguished and long-serving as John Dingell would not receive an answer from the FCC to a question so vital to his constituency.

"Every day, free and local television provides news, entertainment and lifeline emergency weather information to tens of millions of Americans. Under NAB's analysis of the FCC's National Broadband Plan, local television's future could be irreparably diminished, and Congressman Dingell's concern clearly arises from the fact that Detroit citizens could lose access to all of their local TV stations because of U.S. treaty obligations with Canada.

"If the FCC has evidence proving that NAB's analysis is incorrect, it should make it available, and quickly.”

Click on the following links to view copies of Dingell’s letter sent on June 17; Chairman Genachowski’s response sent on Aug. 3; and Dingell’s letter sent on Aug. 16, as well as a zip file of the three letters.

Edit Article

Tags

Comments (8) -

Iconoclastd Nickname posted 9 months ago
No answer is always preferabe to lies: which does Dingel prefer? Of course, the FCC is a "creature of Congress" it' s just that Julius believes otherwise. The only way to get his attention is to zero-out FCC funding.
Homebrew Nickname posted 9 months ago
I Agree.
D BP Nickname posted 9 months ago
Hmm, I wonder why the FCC is not responding to Rep. Dingell's questions? Could it be that with the modeling they're doing the FCC is discovering that repacking the band WILL cause irreparable harm to broadcast TV despite the 'win-win-win' blather coming from the chairman? Putting the FCC and Congress on a collision course as Genachowski is doing is not a wise move. Someone is going to get hurt and it won't be Congress (but, hopefully, it won't be broadcasters either).
Iconoclastd Nickname posted 9 months ago
for all we know, D BP, you know more about this than the depleted engineering staff at the FCC. This is being run from the 8th floor.
D BP Nickname posted 9 months ago
If you read Genachowski's reply to Rep. Dingell it would appear that the FCC is still struggling with the modeling software. Either that or the software is only confirming the NAB's findings, which would prove embarrassing to Genachowski. Whatever the case, Rep. Dingell's letter is it plain: no information, no voluntary spectrum auction.
Rick Tallent posted 9 months ago
My small church struggled to raise enough money to put our lptv on the air, only to have the FCC AFTER THE FACT, sell our channel to AT&T. When AT&T demanded that we cease broadcasting or face legal action, they were able to do so with the full permission and approval of the FCC, and we were left with NO COMPENSATION for the loss of our station's transmitter equipment. Now we have to raise another $50-100 THOUSAND DOLLARS just to get back on the air. Yeah, Mr. Dingell, go after the Commissioners with EXTREME PREJUDICE---they have bragged about not having to answer to Congress and are trying to destroy the broadcast business. At least when Nextel wanted the microwave channels, they compensated the licensees for the inconvenience. All we received from AT&T was threats of legal action from their corporate lawyers.
Iconoclastd Nickname posted 9 months ago
frankly, you either chose the wrong channel, or didn't move quick enough. Sad, but not the FCC's fault; you were always on notice that your spectrum use was secondary to all current and future uses, and that has been the case since September 1980.
Rick Tallent posted 9 months ago
By the way, the reason they are hesitant to answer Congressman Dingell is that they are trying to figure out how to justify their actions. Just like with the Comcast-NBC deal, I wonder when Genochowski and his fellow commissioners will go to work for the telco's with extra large salaries!!!???!!! As Will Rogers said almost a hundred years ago, "We have nothing to worry about because we've got the best politicians money can buy!" Go get them, Mr. Dingell!!!

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2874.04 -19.72 (-0.68%)
NYSE 7592.82 -42.99 (-0.56%)
S&P 500 1324.80 -5.86 (-0.44%)
Updated 05/17 1:45a ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for May 15, 2012
  • 1.
    3.2/9
  • 2.
    2.8/8
  • 3.
    2.5/7
  • 4.
    1.7/5
  • 5.
    1.6/5
  • 6.
    0.4/1
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • David Wiegand

    Fans of Sex and the City have finally gotten their wish: Their beloved sex-focused sitcom is back on the air ... sort of. The four women have become four men, of course, and the writing isn't as good. Oh, and the laugh track so annoying, it's offensive. And did I mention that the costumes would be considered fashionable if you were holding a yard sale? Men at Work on TBS is almost quaint, it's so old fashioned. If it had any meat on its bones, you'd be tempted to say it's the sadly ignoble epitome of TV's long-festering emasculated-men syndrome. But it's so much of a big, forgettable, innocuous shrug, it's not even worth any actual vitriol.

  • Mike Hale

    The USA Network's motto is "Characters Welcome." Apparently they're especially welcome if they resemble Oscar Madison and Felix Unger. Already stocked with Odd Couple knockoffs in Psych and White Collar, USA adds to its inventory Common Law, another comic crime-fighting show about mismatched partners. But this latest entry exhibits very little of that kind of spark as it tries to wring laughs from the juxtaposition of counseling and police work. It looks too flat and schematically plotted to succeed as the type of lightweight summer fun we’ve come to expect from USA.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Johnny Carson: Fantastic entertainer, miserable human being. That's the lasting message of Johnny Carson: King of Late Night, the new PBS American Masters film, a rich history of a rare product of television who dominated the small screen for decades. Unprecedented access to personal archives plus all existing episodes of The Tonight Show (1962-92), distinguishes this film by Peter Jones. Telling interviews with family and colleagues, including second wife Joanne Carson, former Tonight Show executive producer Peter Lassally and a number of biographers sharpen the picture. The clips are carefully selected to illustrate specific personality traits, the performance highlights are given context and meaning beyond funny lines and memorable moments.

  • Hank Stuever

    AMC's The Pitch is a sharply-made if slightly off-putting reality series that follows different advertising agencies each week as they compete for new accounts. The inspiration for the show — made clear by its own ad campaign — is to harness some of the verve generated by the network's acclaimed Mad Men. The Pitch has a way of making the ad world seem like a real downer — a repugnant exercise in egotism laced with depressing bouts of creative compromise.

  • Tim Goodman

    HBO's Veep stars Julia Louis-Dreyfus as former Sen. Selina Meyer, who accepts the vice presidential duty and regrets it almost immediately: She has no real power and gets muscled by the Senate, Congress and the (so-far-unseen) president, who delegates all the truly crappy jobs to her. Louis-Dreyfus has found perhaps her best post-Seinfeld role and takes to it with such fervor — the constant swearing, the barely veiled desire to become president, the unhappy give-and-take with other politicians and a delightful disdain for average citizens — that you can't help but applaud what is clearly an Emmy-worthy effort. Her work alone makes Veep a gem, but there's even more to like.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad