Severe Weather: Q&A With KWTV's Gary England

Tracking Tornadoes, Saving Lives For 40 Years

The meteorologist at Griffin Communications’ KWTV Oklahoma City has seen a lot of changes in weather forecasting since he first joined the CBS affiliate. But while his technology has evolved tremendously from the days of black & white radar, his philosophy and mission haven’t: Do the weather and the warnings, but balance that when you can with a little bit of humor. This is the first of six articles that will appear this week and that collectively constitute a TVNewsCheck Special Report on Severe Weather News.
TVNewsCheck,

Many TV stations are considered local institutions, and sometimes so are their meteorologists. Among the latter is Gary England who for the past 39 years has been delivering weather forecasts for Griffin Communications' KWTV Oklahoma City, (DMA 45), and, more important, providing critical information about tornados and other severe weather whenever they threaten the sprawling market.

Over the years, he has amassed an extraordinary collection of honors and awards, culminating last year with the Society of Professional Journalists' Lifetime Achievement Award. As if to show that that award was not meant to suggest the near end of his long career, SPJ also gave him first place for weather reporting for the year.

Story continues after the ad

In this interview with TVNewsCheck Contributing Editor Arthur Greenwald, England shares some of this thoughts on the ever-improving forecasting and weather tracking technology, what it takes to make it as a TV meteorologist and why tornadoes are as fascinating as they are dangerous.

An edited transcript:


You have seen the technology change quite a bit and you had a good deal to do with developing it. What do you see as the major changes?

Well, it probably has been the various types of radar. There used to be this old black and white radar thing, then color radar and then the Doppler radar. Now there’s phased radar, and all these types of radars and systems that improve with each bit of progress.

Also, everyone now is becoming a amateur meteorologist because of the availability of the computer or the model results on the Internet. So that’s been a bit of  a change for the audience in that they see the models. But the models are right only about 51% of the time. Basically, the problem with the models [and] the maps you pull up on the Internet is that they look real. I mean they really look real and they’re not.

There is also, of course, a revolution in how people receive news in general — on mobile devices and so forth. Does knowing that some of your audience is instantly receiving your reports affect the reporting?

No. It’s still the same thing, at least here. We sit down, we analyze what’s going on, we take a look at the models, we compare our forecasts with the National Weather Service. If there’s a difference, we go back and we look at it and we ponder it and then we put it out. We know it goes out to everyone almost instantaneously. So that doesn't affect us at all. In fact, I like the quick communications.

In some areas of the country, weather promotion is humorous and the weatherman is sort of the comic relief on the newscasts. That can’t be the role you play here given the serious nature of your work.

No. It's serious business. When I first got hired, a long time ago in '72, the guy that hired me was bright. But I was much younger and I thought, well, what does he know. He said to me, "Gary, let me tell you. "Doing television weather in Oklahoma is like getting up on a fence and walking along the top of that fence. If you fall off the one side with meteorology, or if you fall off to the other side with it all being entertainment, you die."

You have to do the balance: Do your weather, do your meteorology, take care of the people, make the warnings, but, in other times, you have to balance that with a little bit of humor, a little bit of fun, but nothing corny.

When you go out into the community, what kind of reaction to you get?

When we have a big event like we had back on May 24, you hear a lot of thank yous for saving my life, and mixed in with all that is a lot of "thanks for being here for all these years" because in severe weather they seem to really appreciate experience.

How much further in advance are you able to forecast a tornado event these days than when you started in the '70s?

Oh my gosh, when I first came here, I could only warn you because it blew your uncle Charlie’s house away up the road a few miles and was coming your way. That’s about how bad it was.

Most of the warnings in the '70s, not all of them, but most of them were minus two minutes, minus five minutes. I mean the tornado’s already touched down and it's on its way to someone else’s house. Nowadays, if it’s a good-sized tornado, a minimum of 10 minutes. Many times, it will be more like 20, 30, 40 minutes, sometimes an hour. The warning time now is excellent. People have time to take their safety precautions. It’s quite amazing, the transformation.

Edit Article

Tags

Comments (2) -

paul greeley posted 10 months ago
Great article and interview with a legend in weather forecasting in OKC. Not only is Gary the worl's expert on tornadoes, he's a really good guy. Paul Greeley pgreeley98@aol.com
Shaun Stehly posted 10 months ago
Preparedness, not panic or fear, are the operative words. People need to prepare for the financial and insurance-related impacts of calamitous events including fires, hurricanes, explosions, earthquakes, floods, thefts, and other unpredictable emergencies. What If You Lost it All? Here’s a link to a DocuHome home inventory and it’s free... http://docuhome.com/index.asp?action=POPSIGNUP&PromoCode=TXSHAUN

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2874.04 -19.72 (-0.68%)
NYSE 7592.82 -42.99 (-0.56%)
S&P 500 1324.80 -5.86 (-0.44%)
Updated 05/17 1:39ä ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for 5月 15, 2012
  • 1.
    3.2/9
  • 2.
    2.8/8
  • 3.
    2.5/7
  • 4.
    1.7/5
  • 5.
    1.6/5
  • 6.
    0.4/1
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • David Wiegand

    Fans of Sex and the City have finally gotten their wish: Their beloved sex-focused sitcom is back on the air ... sort of. The four women have become four men, of course, and the writing isn't as good. Oh, and the laugh track so annoying, it's offensive. And did I mention that the costumes would be considered fashionable if you were holding a yard sale? Men at Work on TBS is almost quaint, it's so old fashioned. If it had any meat on its bones, you'd be tempted to say it's the sadly ignoble epitome of TV's long-festering emasculated-men syndrome. But it's so much of a big, forgettable, innocuous shrug, it's not even worth any actual vitriol.

  • Mike Hale

    The USA Network's motto is "Characters Welcome." Apparently they're especially welcome if they resemble Oscar Madison and Felix Unger. Already stocked with Odd Couple knockoffs in Psych and White Collar, USA adds to its inventory Common Law, another comic crime-fighting show about mismatched partners. But this latest entry exhibits very little of that kind of spark as it tries to wring laughs from the juxtaposition of counseling and police work. It looks too flat and schematically plotted to succeed as the type of lightweight summer fun we’ve come to expect from USA.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Johnny Carson: Fantastic entertainer, miserable human being. That's the lasting message of Johnny Carson: King of Late Night, the new PBS American Masters film, a rich history of a rare product of television who dominated the small screen for decades. Unprecedented access to personal archives plus all existing episodes of The Tonight Show (1962-92), distinguishes this film by Peter Jones. Telling interviews with family and colleagues, including second wife Joanne Carson, former Tonight Show executive producer Peter Lassally and a number of biographers sharpen the picture. The clips are carefully selected to illustrate specific personality traits, the performance highlights are given context and meaning beyond funny lines and memorable moments.

  • Hank Stuever

    AMC's The Pitch is a sharply-made if slightly off-putting reality series that follows different advertising agencies each week as they compete for new accounts. The inspiration for the show — made clear by its own ad campaign — is to harness some of the verve generated by the network's acclaimed Mad Men. The Pitch has a way of making the ad world seem like a real downer — a repugnant exercise in egotism laced with depressing bouts of creative compromise.

  • Tim Goodman

    HBO's Veep stars Julia Louis-Dreyfus as former Sen. Selina Meyer, who accepts the vice presidential duty and regrets it almost immediately: She has no real power and gets muscled by the Senate, Congress and the (so-far-unseen) president, who delegates all the truly crappy jobs to her. Louis-Dreyfus has found perhaps her best post-Seinfeld role and takes to it with such fervor — the constant swearing, the barely veiled desire to become president, the unhappy give-and-take with other politicians and a delightful disdain for average citizens — that you can't help but applaud what is clearly an Emmy-worthy effort. Her work alone makes Veep a gem, but there's even more to like.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad