Front Office by Mary Collins

TV Everywhere Can Work For Everyone

It's not about the technology used for delivering TV programming; it’s about the viewer’s ability to access the desired programming at the desired time using the most convenient device or platform for that particular moment. TV Everywhere addresses those needs by allowing customers to take their pay TV subscriptions with them, preserving the traditional business model.
By
TVNewsCheck,

Will TV Everywhere preempt the loss of viewers and revenue for TV networks and stations that can occur as a result of “over the top” (OTT) video services?  With the vast majority of broadcast television households subscribing to a cable, satellite or telecom company paying retransmission consent fees, that’s becoming a bigger question for broadcasters.

Stories outlining the threat of OTT are appearing in virtually every edition of our industry trade publications. Most recently, these stories have included coverage of an SNL Kagan survey forecasting some 10% of U.S. homes will have discontinued their pay TV subscriptions by 2015. Other recent news items have reported that there are now more than 4,000 models of connected TVs finding their way into U.S. households. In fact, Leichtman Research estimated that nearly one-third of households already have connected their TVs to the Internet.

Story continues after the ad

While it may seem like a misnomer to use the term “cut the cord” to describe the projected loss of TV viewers to the Internet, which primarily still uses a wire to reach consumers, the industry’s adoption of the term “TV Everywhere” is a good reminder that we are living in a multiplatform environment. Now, more than ever, it’s not about the technology used for delivering TV programming; it’s about the viewer’s ability to access the desired programming at the desired time using the most convenient device or platform for that particular moment. TV Everywhere addresses those needs by allowing customers to take their pay TV subscriptions with them, preserving the traditional business model.

With so much riding on the industry’s ability to minimize — or even “opportunize” — the OTT phenomenon, the Media Financial Management Association featured a “one-on-one session” at our 2011 annual conference involving Andy Heller, vice chairman of Turner Broadcasting System, and Paul Maxwell, owner and CEO of Media Business Corp.

Their discussion had such an impact on our attendees that it was chosen as the cover story in the July-August issue of MFM’s The Financial Manager magazine. Editor Janet Stilson, a longtime media business writer and analyst, used the topics discussed by Heller and Maxwell to drill more deeply into the underlying problems and immense opportunities associated with the TV Everywhere solution. Here are a few insights that emerged from her conversation with Heller, who has been at the forefront of Time Warner’s TV Everywhere efforts: 

TV Everywhere is already available almost anywhere. By early fall, Heller expects cable, telecom and satellite companies representing as many as 85 million subscribers will be offering TV Everywhere access to subscription TV channels such as HBO and ESPN. 

Not all TV Everywhere solutions are the same. Each service provider is deploying it slightly differently, Heller finds. While several major MSOs have built Internet portals such as Comcast’s Xfinity, others are authenticating TV Everywhere off the programmers’ websites, avoiding the time and expense of launching and running a big portal. On the downside, theses differences in implementation preclude having a uniform process that would make it easier for educating subscribers on how to access and locate the programming they want to watch.

Audience measurement is still evolving. One of the hurdles for securing broader participation by TV networks is the concern they will lose advertising dollars if viewership on these alternative devices can’t be measured. 

Solutions such as Nielsen’s C3 ratings for measuring time-shifted viewership of content watched though DVRs or video on demand needs to be extended to these other viewing platforms. “If we can get appropriate measurement for that, there is a big win-win for everybody,” Heller says.

Networks need to stream their programming. Programming such as weather, general news, sports news and live sports events is ideally suited for TV Everywhere. These genres represent the types of programming that viewers want to access wherever they are over the device that’s the most convenient for the setting. Heller expects increased use of streaming media will help to advance “the promise of legitimate, dynamically inserted advertising on a much broader basis than it would have otherwise happened.”

He also views streaming media as one of the drivers for accelerating the speed for deploying set-top-box applications outside the cable box. “For example, Verizon is moving to a set-top-box-less format where they’re going to have set-top-box applications available on Playstation and Xbox and the iPad ands Android tablets. This allows the distributor to make the navigation inside their offering really simple for the consumer,” Heller said.

TV Everywhere is added value for existing subscriptions rather than an additional source of revenue. Heller doesn’t advocate charging customers more for TV Everywhere access, at least initially. While both distributors and programmers are incurring additional costs, he believes offering it for free is the smartest way to secure “early, fast easy adoption. I don’t think you want to put barriers in the way of giving consumers access to TV Everywhere; let them see how much they enjoy it, and then you can figure out whether or not it’s smart to have incremental costs associated with it, especially given the access they have to content from other places,” he advises.

Edit Article

Tags

Comments (6) -

RustbeltAlumnus2 Nickname posted 10 months ago
Preserving the traditional model means "continuing to bundle unwanted channels with desired channels" which is illegal (block-booking) when applied to movie theaters and TV but apparently no big deal with cable. I don't want to pay Comcast more just because they added 4 channels I never watch.
PhillyPhlash Nickname posted 10 months ago
This is the most anti-broadcast TV article I've ever read is a broadcast TV trade. Not a word about over-the-air mobile TV, which, if promoted properly, would ensure that local/network broadcast TV remains the most efficient means of reaching a mass audience -- especially if market demand forces cellphone makers to put ATSC M/H chips in their products. Mary Collins advances the arguments of a pay TV/broadband advocate at the expense of the public interest, which benefits from the continued universal, free availability of over-the-air broadcast stations. Mary, young people are DROPPING SUBSCRIPTION PAY TV in increasing numbers, choosing instead to rely on free, over-the-air TV supplemented by internet viewing of specific shows they want to see. Your notion of "TV everywhere" is a PAY TV everywhere scheme designed to kill off free over-the-air broadcasting. Why you are given a platform here is a mystery to me.
OnlyFreeTVworks Nickname posted 10 months ago
Philly you hit the nail on the head. It is this positioning that continues to advance the model that if you can't pay you lose. The concept that free connectivity will become universal is as empty headed as it gets. Its like give 'em the drugs for now and once their hooked there is no other choice but to pay for the bits you consume. Where is the best interest of the general public in this equation. Oh by the way I guess I missed the idea that TV Everywhere is a public service model with no expectation of an ROI or public fund hand out. This is more of an advertisement than an informative bit of commentary. Where is the logic?
EricPost Nickname posted 10 months ago
Streaming is dead, it started when the caps went on ISP. What we need is to open up cable, like we did with AT&T to allow anyone to have a cable company over proprietary lines. This is what we did with AT&T and you saw how fast the price of long distance fell. We need an REA for fiber. Let's make it a project to wire every house that has electricity now with fiber. This way one line can deliver phone, Internet and cable. Then open that up to anyone that wants to provide service. Of course cities won't like it as they make millions on franchise agreements. DTV is a failure. It uses technology hopelessly outdated. Simple plan, make all OTA TV standard def only. If people want HDTV let them pay for it. This will free up bandwidth. Then let's do another digital transition BUT make any future system upgradable. It'll be hard, but for thousands that already lost free TV due to the pathetic DTV signals, it won't matter either way.
PhillyPhlash Nickname posted 10 months ago
ATSC DTV signals could be made more robust, and it could be done with backward compatibility. The greedsters (including those at the FCC) won't let it happen. As for taking away free HD, that toothpaste is already out of the tube. Politically, that kind of fascist "let 'em eat cake" solution is D.O.A.
BostonMarket Nickname posted 7 months ago
Who wouldn't want to have TVs around. It brings fun and entertainment Boston Market Coupons

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2874.04 -19.72 (-0.68%)
NYSE 7592.82 -42.99 (-0.56%)
S&P 500 1324.80 -5.86 (-0.44%)
Updated 05/17 1:37a ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for May 15, 2012
  • 1.
    3.2/9
  • 2.
    2.8/8
  • 3.
    2.5/7
  • 4.
    1.7/5
  • 5.
    1.6/5
  • 6.
    0.4/1
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • David Wiegand

    Fans of Sex and the City have finally gotten their wish: Their beloved sex-focused sitcom is back on the air ... sort of. The four women have become four men, of course, and the writing isn't as good. Oh, and the laugh track so annoying, it's offensive. And did I mention that the costumes would be considered fashionable if you were holding a yard sale? Men at Work on TBS is almost quaint, it's so old fashioned. If it had any meat on its bones, you'd be tempted to say it's the sadly ignoble epitome of TV's long-festering emasculated-men syndrome. But it's so much of a big, forgettable, innocuous shrug, it's not even worth any actual vitriol.

  • Mike Hale

    The USA Network's motto is "Characters Welcome." Apparently they're especially welcome if they resemble Oscar Madison and Felix Unger. Already stocked with Odd Couple knockoffs in Psych and White Collar, USA adds to its inventory Common Law, another comic crime-fighting show about mismatched partners. But this latest entry exhibits very little of that kind of spark as it tries to wring laughs from the juxtaposition of counseling and police work. It looks too flat and schematically plotted to succeed as the type of lightweight summer fun we’ve come to expect from USA.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Johnny Carson: Fantastic entertainer, miserable human being. That's the lasting message of Johnny Carson: King of Late Night, the new PBS American Masters film, a rich history of a rare product of television who dominated the small screen for decades. Unprecedented access to personal archives plus all existing episodes of The Tonight Show (1962-92), distinguishes this film by Peter Jones. Telling interviews with family and colleagues, including second wife Joanne Carson, former Tonight Show executive producer Peter Lassally and a number of biographers sharpen the picture. The clips are carefully selected to illustrate specific personality traits, the performance highlights are given context and meaning beyond funny lines and memorable moments.

  • Hank Stuever

    AMC's The Pitch is a sharply-made if slightly off-putting reality series that follows different advertising agencies each week as they compete for new accounts. The inspiration for the show — made clear by its own ad campaign — is to harness some of the verve generated by the network's acclaimed Mad Men. The Pitch has a way of making the ad world seem like a real downer — a repugnant exercise in egotism laced with depressing bouts of creative compromise.

  • Tim Goodman

    HBO's Veep stars Julia Louis-Dreyfus as former Sen. Selina Meyer, who accepts the vice presidential duty and regrets it almost immediately: She has no real power and gets muscled by the Senate, Congress and the (so-far-unseen) president, who delegates all the truly crappy jobs to her. Louis-Dreyfus has found perhaps her best post-Seinfeld role and takes to it with such fervor — the constant swearing, the barely veiled desire to become president, the unhappy give-and-take with other politicians and a delightful disdain for average citizens — that you can't help but applaud what is clearly an Emmy-worthy effort. Her work alone makes Veep a gem, but there's even more to like.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad