Jessell at large

TVB Pushing To Move Fed Ad $$ To Local TV

The TV trade group was the source of the FCC’s recent recommendation that the federal government divert its advertising dollars from the national media to local media. And TVB didn’t stop there. Now it’s hard after the government money. For starters, it's trying to get a better accounting of exactly how much money there is and where exactly it is coming from. Then it's off to Washington. TVB has to convince the bureaucrats not only of the efficacy of local media, but of the relative merits of local TV. Good job.
TVNewsCheck,

How would you like another 5% on your top line?

Well, you might just get it (or something close to it), thanks to the initiative of the TVB and the perception and astuteness of the FCC.

Story continues after the ad

Let's start with the FCC.

Last month, the agency released its study on what might be done to bolster local media and the journalism it produces. The Information Needs of Communities: The Changing Media Landscape in A Broadband Age was written by Steve Waldman, an ex-journalist that FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski had brought in for the job.

Among its key recommendations: The federal government should divert its advertising dollars from the national media to local media. "Targeting existing federal advertising spending to local news media could help local news media models — both commercial and nonprofit, online and off-line — gain traction and help create local jobs, while potentially making taxpayer spending more cost-effective."

Good idea.

Nobody right now has a good handle on just how much the feds spend on advertising, but the FCC and others think it's around $1 billion.

Much of that comes from the Defense Department and its recruitment efforts. But other spenders include the national parks, Job Corps, the U.S. Postal Service, Health and Human Services, the Department of Transportation and the Veterans Administration. In 2010, the U.S. Census reportedly dropped $128 million as part of its head-counting campaign.

And according to the FCC and the TVB, most the money now goes to the broadcast and cable networks and other national media. TVB thinks the locals now get 10% at most.

So, if local media are getting just $100 million of the $1 billion federal spend, they are not getting $900 million, which amounts to just about 5% of the $19.4 billion in TV station revenue this year.

That $900 million or 5% then is the prize.

When I first saw Waldman's recommendation, I made a note to ask TVB just what it was going to do to exploit it. A recommendation is only that unless someone takes action.

When I finally got around to contracting TVB this week, I was surprised to learn that not only was it working on the recommendation, it was the source of it.

On April 15, as the Waldman and his team at the FCC were wrapping up the project, TVB President Steve Lanzano sent Waldman a three-page letter suggesting that the government focus its advertising on local media. It's in the public record.

In the letter, Lanzano also makes the case for why local television should be the particular local medium of choice:

Local TV can save the government money. Network TV time is 29% more expensive. "In fact, utilizing non-network dayparts in addition to the standard network dayparts, an advertiser can achieve even greater savings than the 29%...."

Local TV allows the government to target advertising to markets where it will do the most good. "Because nearly every product or service has some sort of geographic skew, this ability can greatly enhance the effectiveness of the advertising. Additionally, local media properties, particularly local television stations, offer the advertiser the ability to create local sponsorships that can help tie the advertiser to the local interests and concerns of each community."

Local TV gives government advertisers more flexibility. They can cancel ads in one market and move them to another "on a relatively immediate basis....The advertiser has the ability to 'heavy up' and 'lighten up' the ... spend in direct relationship to the campaign's performance goals, thus permitting the campaign to be undertaken more effectively over time."

Local TV is not difficult to buy. National sales reps "represent broadcast stations in markets across the country and streamline the buying process."

What I like about the pitch is that it is not a hat-in-hand appeal. Rather, it's based on the strength of local TV — that it can save the government money or at least give it more bang for the buck. There's a lot of budget cutting going on in DC these days.

That the spending would also help support hard-pressed local media and journalism is the sweetener.

On the phone yesterday, Lanzano told me that TVB is already hard after the government money. For starters, he says, it's trying to get a better accounting of exactly how much money there is and where exactly it is coming from.

Then it's off to Washington. TVB has to convince the bureaucrats not only of the efficacy of local media, but of the relative merits of local TV, Lanzano says.

TVB is willing to share the $900 million with other media only to the extent it has to. "We can make them more targeted and more efficient by moving those national dollars to local TV," he says. "I don't think you can make the same argument with newspapers."

Edit Article

Tags

Comments (5) -

bob gordon posted 10 months ago
Ahhh local TV...does anyone remember when a TV station was really responsible to the local viewers (not market)..too many local stations owned means that there are no local stations anymore... I believe that with the power of the local media comes local responsibility that can only be carried out by local ownership, so here it comes...the citizens who own the airways would surely be better served when the station owner is required to reside and vote within the coverage area of the local radio and TV they own. Since the 7 station rule the only beneficiaries have been wall street bankers, no one else, today there is less news, few if any locally produced shows and even less local personality.
Thomas Scanlan posted 10 months ago
Bob, your reference to the 'good old days' of 7-7-7 rings so true in so many ways! We produced FAR more opportunities for LOCAL ownership, for minorities interested in ownership and management, and for communities to demand and receive REAL attention of key issues. Placement of Congressional candidate ads affect nearly every market, and allow candidates an opportunity to target their specific audience. No reason not to demand the same attention to individual states or other groups by Presidential candidates! Be in Cincinnati, Kearney, Boston, Traverse City or Marquette, they're all LESS served since the 7-7-7 and 12-12-12 went away.
Burt Nickname posted 10 months ago
You two clowns aren't even commenting on the article but whining about 7-7-7. Great article Harry and thanks to TvB for futhering the process. Any help to local television is welcomed.
Chris Rohrs posted 10 months ago
Really good move by TVB .... good thinking!
D BP Nickname posted 10 months ago
Just as government prepares to cut broadcast television off at the knees through a spectrum auction, Waldman's report highlights an inconvenient fact: that 78% of Americans get their news through local TV stations. And nearly all of these stations are also posting their news stories on their websites. So it makes total sense for government agencies to divert more of their ad dollars to local stations.

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2874.04 -19.72 (-0.68%)
NYSE 7592.82 -42.99 (-0.56%)
S&P 500 1324.80 -5.86 (-0.44%)
Updated 05/17 1:32a ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for May 15, 2012
  • 1.
    3.2/9
  • 2.
    2.8/8
  • 3.
    2.5/7
  • 4.
    1.7/5
  • 5.
    1.6/5
  • 6.
    0.4/1
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • David Wiegand

    Fans of Sex and the City have finally gotten their wish: Their beloved sex-focused sitcom is back on the air ... sort of. The four women have become four men, of course, and the writing isn't as good. Oh, and the laugh track so annoying, it's offensive. And did I mention that the costumes would be considered fashionable if you were holding a yard sale? Men at Work on TBS is almost quaint, it's so old fashioned. If it had any meat on its bones, you'd be tempted to say it's the sadly ignoble epitome of TV's long-festering emasculated-men syndrome. But it's so much of a big, forgettable, innocuous shrug, it's not even worth any actual vitriol.

  • Mike Hale

    The USA Network's motto is "Characters Welcome." Apparently they're especially welcome if they resemble Oscar Madison and Felix Unger. Already stocked with Odd Couple knockoffs in Psych and White Collar, USA adds to its inventory Common Law, another comic crime-fighting show about mismatched partners. But this latest entry exhibits very little of that kind of spark as it tries to wring laughs from the juxtaposition of counseling and police work. It looks too flat and schematically plotted to succeed as the type of lightweight summer fun we’ve come to expect from USA.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Johnny Carson: Fantastic entertainer, miserable human being. That's the lasting message of Johnny Carson: King of Late Night, the new PBS American Masters film, a rich history of a rare product of television who dominated the small screen for decades. Unprecedented access to personal archives plus all existing episodes of The Tonight Show (1962-92), distinguishes this film by Peter Jones. Telling interviews with family and colleagues, including second wife Joanne Carson, former Tonight Show executive producer Peter Lassally and a number of biographers sharpen the picture. The clips are carefully selected to illustrate specific personality traits, the performance highlights are given context and meaning beyond funny lines and memorable moments.

  • Hank Stuever

    AMC's The Pitch is a sharply-made if slightly off-putting reality series that follows different advertising agencies each week as they compete for new accounts. The inspiration for the show — made clear by its own ad campaign — is to harness some of the verve generated by the network's acclaimed Mad Men. The Pitch has a way of making the ad world seem like a real downer — a repugnant exercise in egotism laced with depressing bouts of creative compromise.

  • Tim Goodman

    HBO's Veep stars Julia Louis-Dreyfus as former Sen. Selina Meyer, who accepts the vice presidential duty and regrets it almost immediately: She has no real power and gets muscled by the Senate, Congress and the (so-far-unseen) president, who delegates all the truly crappy jobs to her. Louis-Dreyfus has found perhaps her best post-Seinfeld role and takes to it with such fervor — the constant swearing, the barely veiled desire to become president, the unhappy give-and-take with other politicians and a delightful disdain for average citizens — that you can't help but applaud what is clearly an Emmy-worthy effort. Her work alone makes Veep a gem, but there's even more to like.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad