TVNewscheck focus on Washington

Virtual Duopolies Coming Under Fire

With the FCC reviewing its TV station ownership policies, public interest groups and the American Cable Association, concerned about broadcasters' leverage in retransmission consent negotiations, want the FCC to tighten up its rules to break up virtual duopolies or, at the very least, prevent the formation of new ones.

So-called virtual duopolies are a fact of life in TV broadcasting.

For more than 20 years, broadcasters, through various contractual arrangements, have enjoyed the efficiencies of running multiple stations in a market, even where FCC rules limit broadcasters to owning just one.

Story continues after the ad

But such duopolies may now be in jeopardy.

Advocacy groups concerned about media consolidation and the American Cable Association, concerned about broadcasters' leverage in retransmission consent negotiations, want the FCC to tighten up its rules to break up virtual duopolies or, at the very least, prevent the formation of new ones.

"Some of these agreements are clear violations of the rules," says Angela Campbell, who represents the Communications Workers of America and Media Council of Hawaii in their effort to block Raycom Media from controlling three stations in Honolulu. "What's the point of having rules if you're not going to enforce them?"

The ACA railed against virtual duopolies last month in an FCC inquiry into whether new rules or procedures are needed to protect small cable operators from being gouged by stations in retrans negotiations.

Brand Connections

Through the various duopoly arrangements, "one entity is allowed to conduct retransmission consent negotiations on behalf of two ‘must-have' affiliates, resulting in small cable operators paying substantially more for retransmission consent than if the two affiliates had to negotiate separate deals," says the coalition of small operators.

"These broadcaster negotiating alliances drive up the cost of retransmission consent by about 21%," it claims.

Although ACA's principal interest is reform of the retrans regulations, it may also support limits on virtual duopolies. "Nobody should be surprised to see ACA weigh in on this issue as part of the media ownership review," says Ross Lieberman, ACA's VP of government affairs.

The extent to which virtual duopolies are to be allowed is likely to be revisited in the FCC's quadrennial review of all its broadcast ownership rules, which the agency kicked off last month by inviting comments on them.

In that proceeding, broadcasters will urge the commission to relax its duopoly rule so that they can own multiple stations in small markets and convert virtual duopolies into real duopolies.

Opponents of media consolidation will oppose any relaxation of the rule and ask to close "loopholes" now allowing broadcasters to control multiple stations in smaller markets.

As part of its review, the FCC is commissioning several studies. Among them may be one that will gauge the scope and nature of the many virtual duopolies now in place, according to commission sources.

Virtual duopolies emerged in the late 1980s when the FCC began allowing stations to engage in local marketing agreements under which one station would, for all practical purposes, run another in the same market.

In 1999, the FCC revised its local TV ownership rules to permit common ownership of two stations in larger markets where there are at least eight competing television owners as long as one of the two stations was not rated among the top four.

Significantly, the FCC also OK'd virtual duopolies created through the local marketing agreements, but limited them. The controlling station could not program more than 15% of the programming day of the other station, it said.

The agency also adopted a "failed station" policy to allow common ownership of two stations in a small market if it could be demonstrated that one of the stations might go dark without help.

The deregulatory moves triggered a wave of local consolidation in the larger markets with major station groups like CBS, Fox, Tribune and NBC doubling up.

At the same time, other broadcasters pushed ahead with virtual duopolies in smaller markets (those with fewer than eight owners) through a variety of contractual arrangements -- local marketing agreements, shared services agreements and joint operating agreements.

By whatever name, they enabled broadcasters to operate multiple stations in small markets and enjoy the operational efficiencies, even where they cannot own multiple stations.

The virtual duopolies take a variety of forms. In some cases, the arrangements are between two completely independent and established broadcasters.

Just last week, LIN TV said it would be taking over the management of stations owned by Acme Communications in three markets: Albuquerque-Santa Fe, N.M.; Dayton, Ohio; and Green Bay-Appleton, Wis.

But, in many other cases, duopoly broadcasters have taken control of second stations in markets by creating and financing ownership entities to acquire them and then enter into duopoly agreements.

Sinclair Broadcast Group and Nexstar Broadcasting are masters of these types of virtual duopolies. They have put together entire station groups -- Cunningham and Mission, respectively -- to own second stations that they may operate under current rules.

The FCC does not have a good handle on how many duopolies -- real or virtual -- there are today among the approximately 1,800 full-power TV stations or where they are. In one proceeding, it said there were 175 duopolies based on data supplied by BIA/Kelsey, but offered no details.

Comments (7) -

Wayne Casa posted over 6 years ago
SSA/LMA's are constructive and in many cases essential, especially when services are provided to underserved segments of the population. Larger markets may have less need than smaller ones, perhaps there is a need by the FCC to review and evaluate whether specific markets have an excess of stations, or incentivize the SSA/LMA's to adjust programming to serve the underserved segments I previously mentioned. Perhaps the FCC should incentivize stations and cable operators carriage by redrafting the "must carry / retrans" rules , further endorse minority participation and incentivize qualified individual and groups to assume programming responsibility of SSA/LMA's as a condition to be met in the license renewal process. These are all sensitive issues, there are vested interests involved but if there is a sincere interest in opening up the process, the FCC should not be looking at the issues on a piece meal basis but comprehensively.
Nodak Nickname posted over 6 years ago
I'm glad someone is calling attention to the duopoly violation in smaller markets. Corpus Christi is a blatant example with one company owning two low power signals and two of what once was known as VHF signals. There are only five VHF signals in the market and so Channel 6 (KRIS-NBC) and Channel 10 (KZTV-CBS) are owned by the same company and are in the process of moving everything into one building. The local ABC affiliate, Channel 3 (KIII) opposed the move but that dismissed. The PBS station doesn't do local news and local radio stations do none except for pulling material from the local newspaper. One local news talk station sort of does news in the morning meaning it has a person in the building working on a few stories. So our marketplace of ideas is limited to a Spanish VHF station, the ABC affiliate, the newspaper, and the duopoly. Four voices for a city of 300,000.
Sammy Nickname posted over 6 years ago
You guys know TV is a business, right? It costs a lot of money to do news, right? If you broke up many of these LMA/SSAs you would not get a robust news product across town- you would get a failed station.
Bad Deal posted over 6 years ago
A robust news with one skewed viewpoint is better than two crappy newscasts with differing views? I would rather have the later. Yes in today's economy it maybe hard to cash out and retire early but if that is what you want then you should get out of this business and let people who love to work in TV stations run them. Greed has pushed out the local TV station owner who cared for his employees and community. The companies today gut good stations to keep the profits big. I bet they provided a lot better product than the virtual duopolies ever will because they cared. How can they posibly provide good quality? The bigger point is than news or voices is corporate greed at the expense of local jobs and local views.
RustbeltAlumnus2 Nickname posted over 6 years ago
I laughed when I read, what's the use of having rules if you don't enforce them. I imagine a lot of voters in Arizona are wondering the same thing about immigration laws. We only enforce the rules with which we agree, depending on who got elected. We're not a nation of laws. We're a nation of political power brokers and ideologues.
ken myers posted over 6 years ago
Yeah how about Tribune's connection with Local TV LLC and their shell company named the "OTHER COMPANY" Nexstar and Mission Valley, SInclair and Glencarin, etc..etc. It is time for the FCC to wake up.
RayNet Nickname posted over 6 years ago
When respondents cite the number of "voices" in a market, they conveniently omit the numerous cable news sources as well as internet news sources. Political discourse is plentiful on all of these sites each and every day. You can find political viewpoints, political discussion etc. literally in hundreds of places. In addition, if you have cable, the local cable company carries city council meetings of a host of different local communities. For the life of me I cant imagine why anyone would equate "only" 3 or 4 separate TV owners in a market with lack of news diversity.
Marketshare Blog Playout Blog




Overnights, adults 18-49 for September 26, 2016
  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
Source: Nielsen


  • Rob Owen

    Easily fall’s best broadcast network comedy pilot, NBC’s The Good Place offers a clever high-concept premise that’s complemented with intelligent, sometimes absurdist humor. Created by Michael Schur, co-creator of NBC’s Parks and Recreation, The Good Place is a highly serialized series that’s essentially set in heaven and stars Kristen Bell and Ted Danson. NBC made five episodes of The Good Place available for review, and the show not only holds up, but also it improves, deepening characters that initially feel one-note and frequently leaving viewers guessing with cliffhanger endings to many of the episodes. The combination of snappy dialogue and winning but flawed characters makes The Good Place a great bet for fans of smart TV comedy.

  • Maureen Ryan

    Pitch has swagger, for good reason. It gets the big things right; the Fox drama about the first female baseball player in the Major Leagues is one of the year’s most assured and exciting debuts. But part of what impresses about the pilot is also the way it confidently strings together so many small but telling details. Ginny (Kylie Bunbury) is the first woman to be called up from the minors to the big leagues, and no show since Friday Night Lights has done a better job of portraying the internal and external pressures that weigh heavily on young athletes asked to do much more than merely succeed on the field. Pitch will likely do a good job of getting viewers to root for it. The hope is that the show won’t be an impressive, short-lived curiosity, but rather a long-term phenomenon.

  • Kevin Fallon

    In a fall TV season that’s already making a splash for championing diverse, distinctive voices in an array of projects that they created, wrote, and starred in, Better Things on FX stands out. The show is created by, written by, and starsPamela Adlon. She plays Sam Fox, the single mother of three daughters modeled after her own reality-show-ready experience raising three girls in Los Angeles following a divorce. Sam is also, like Adlon, a working actress — on shows both raunchy, a la Californication, and animated for children, like her role on Recess. It’s a refreshingly blunt take on single motherhood without sacrificing the warmth of parental love, portraying the dance between selfishness and selflessness that’s at the heart of being a parent — especially one weathering the hormonal fireworks of a household of four women at different ages.

  • David Wiegand

    The fall TV season doesn’t count as much as it used to — we already know that. But no matter how many retreads the broadcast networks throw at viewers in the next few months, this fall will be memorable because of the premiere of Atlanta on Tuesday, Sept. 6, on FX. The half-hour comedy created by and starring Donald Glover (Community), simply and brilliantly recalibrates our expectations of what a TV comedy is and how black lives are portrayed on the medium.

  • Louisa Ada Seltzer

    The second reboot of the 1980s John Candy movie Uncle Buck, bumped by ABC from midseason, has the same tired jokes you'll find on any second-rate sitcom. Too bad, because Mike Epps is appealing and ABC would be wise to keep him around for future shows, but there’s just not enough to this show to suggest it will last past summer. It also airs against NBC’s America’s Got Talent, summer’s No. 1 program on broadcast, which may make it even harder to find an audience.

  • Neil Genzlinger

    Bryan Cranston brings his Tony Award-winning interpretation of President Lyndon B. Johnson to television in an adaptation of the Robert Schenkkan play All the Way, and it’s still quite a sight to behold, just as it was on Broadway in 2014. Nothing beats witnessing this kind of larger-than-life portrayal onstage, of course. But the television version, presented by HBO, offers plenty of rewards, allowing Cranston to work the close-ups and liberating him from the confines of a theater set. Cranston’s performance is a gem — in his hands, this accidental president comes across as an amazing bundle of contradictions, someone who seems at once too vulgar for the job and just right for it.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad