Sales Office by Eric Koepele

How To Win In The Local Media Market

Eric Koepele, the director of digital media sales for Hearst Television, warns that if local media companies continue to spend more time fighting each other for share than they do providing local marketing expertise, the national players will slowly but surely suck the oxygen out of the room as they make their data-driven marketing models easier for small businesses to use.
By
TVNewsCheck,

As we move deeper into what promises to be a hotly contested election season, we're hearing ever greater rhetoric harking back to the American Revolution.

Whichever side of the political aisle you fall on, the revolutionary fighting spirit -- typically fomented at the local level -- remains an acutely American phenomenon.

Story continues after the ad

The fighting spirit pervades the local media business as well, and that can be healthy of course. But sometimes it's misdirected.

We've all grown up in a landscape of local media companies fighting each other for share of the local marketing budget. Yellow Pages skirmished with direct mail and outdoor, the newspaper took on both -- and television stations have always religiously monitored and reported share.    

Old habits die hard and, as these local media companies build Web businesses, it feels natural for them to position their Web product against historical local competitors. 

The only problem: None of these companies delivers audience share online like it does -- or did -- offline. This makes the "share" battle artificial.

Ten years ago a newspaper in a mid-size market may have reached 80% of the adult residents with its weekly circulation. The network affiliate TV stations reached over 90%. And when something at home broke and it was time to call a plumber, electrician or the air conditioning guy, Yellow Pages was the go-to reference for nearly 100% of consumers. 

Today, of course, Google's done a number on the Yellow Pages. And unless the Yellow Pages develops a new search utility that entices consumers, it's hard to imagine they'll ever approximate the kind of reach online that they used to enjoy with their printed books. 

The newspapers have seen oligopolies -- in many cities, monopolies -- for in-depth local, text-based news turn into an all-out scrum. Now audiences are fed a continuous stream of news updates -- from numerous and potentially limitless sources -- reporting everything from the most hyper-local topics on up to international news. And not always too well.

The local broadcasters are part of that news scrum, meaning some markets have more than half a dozen local news organizations, each battling for 10% reach into the market and none with a large-scale audience like in the good old days.

Now, let's look at it from the vantage point of the marketer. The local marketer now grapples with dozens of local Web entities each claiming to be the biggest by their own preferred metric -- comScore, Nielsen, internal logs, time spent on site, audience interaction, blah, blah, blah...

None of the local Web publishers brings scale to the table online as it might have offline. Meanwhile, the marketer is presented with dozens of localized national offerings from Google to ad networks, with more targeting flavors than Baskin Robbins. 

The marketer's end goal hasn't changed: Grow the business. But it's become immeasurably more time consuming and difficult to do the necessary marketing work online.

So, the local guys fight with each other over 10% table scraps while the national players localize their product and deliver the kind of reach and frequency the marketer is accustomed to buying offline -- and still needs to buy online in order to grow his or her business. The trouble with those national players is that their technology is bewildering, the ad placement is data-driven and making a connection between targeting a cookie profile on a group of hard drives and real events happening in the marketer's community is difficult at best. 

If local media companies continue to spend more time fighting each other for share than they do providing local marketing expertise, the national players will slowly but surely suck the oxygen out of the room as they make their data-driven marketing models ever more intuitive and easy for small businesses to use.

Local marketing will follow its national cousin and become: a) more science, less art; b) more commodity, less creative; and c) more dominated by large national media providers at the expense of the local ad sales departments.

So what are you, as a local Web publisher, to do? 

I don't have all the answers, but here are some things local players need to be thinking about:

Arm the sales department with art AND science. Basic sales training is always good, but more than ever local sellers need to be marketing experts, bringing smart business solutions to their clients daily. Our sellers need to embody the "art" aspect of marketing -- by developing creative ideas that leverage all the media platforms they represent.

Art alone is not enough, our sellers also need to have access to and be masters of strong technology-based marketing tools. For instance, using the ad server to track beyond clicks in order to optimize based on metrics like view-through, the impact display advertising has on search referrals and ensuring reach is maximized and creative is refreshed after the frequency zenith has been attained. Selling a site based on size relative to other local publishers -- or CPM, or other generic metrics -- is as relevant to our clients as Duran Duran is to my 15-year-old daughter (and of even less interest). 

Edit Article

Comments (7) -

Klaatu47 Nickname posted a year ago
blather
justthefacts Nickname posted a year ago
ditto
Rocker Nickname posted a year ago
Blather in what sense? That it's obvious? Or do you mean you think it's off-base? If the former, the point is that there's very little effective execution on these points yet, and we need to get serious about it. If the latter, then sorry I'm afraid you are misinformed and whistling past the graveyard.
Bailusout Nickname posted a year ago
Nice article. But the big problem is most local stations are run not locally but from some castle on a hill hundreds of miles away. Sure they still have GMs but they are becoming yes men to the corporate edicts. One of those edicts is, “GET TOP SHARE at all costs.” “And buy the way, our computer up here on the hill says you should be billing this number not what you sent in last week.” “What is wrong with you?” “We have given you extra digital channels, hired a big time web producer, and even given some of you a HD camera.” Now sell that seldom watched side channel for big bucks, and see how many banners you can cram on you web site that people spend at most less than 2 minutes on.” “Don’t waste our time talking about LOCAL Market conditions which will not compute in our computer! “We know best, that’s why we are here and you are there.” Glad I’m retired and enjoying the view.
Bullmoose Nickname posted a year ago
Bailusout: Sums in up nicely. He gets it!
fondmemory Nickname posted a year ago
Amen, Bailusout. I could almost guess the company for which you worked.
alisa cromer posted a year ago
Bailusout: Funny I've been wondering whether to post a blog on "Are You Pimping Out your Sales Force," I'm sure you get the metaphor. Koepele hits the nail on the head but the subtler issue is the internal culture that seems at odd with itself on these issues: Whether to create an inspired organization built around the customer - or maintain a cynical, organization built around the product comes right from the top. I keep saying that long term - over a year even - there is more money in delving in to mid-tier customers and backing up converting campaigns with legacy media buys (see two campaign on the top marquis of Localmediainsider.com include one from KPAX who literally built a healthcare channel around a hospital - not something you would see a newspaper site do - and WSBTV , who runs a pure mobile text campaigns "If we can't lower your loan we'll give you $500" for a bank, also the kind of aggressively creative thing TV does best). Opportunity abounds!

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2915.86 +11.78 (+0.41%)
NYSE 8082.98 +13.27 (+0.16%)
S&P 500 1349.96 +2.91 (+0.22%)
Updated 02/08 5:19p ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for February 7, 2012
  • 1.
    3.1/8
  • 2.
    3.0/8
  • 3.
    2.4/6
  • 4.
    2.0/5
  • 5.
    1.6/4
  • 6.
    0.6/1
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • Neil Genzlinger

    Smash, NBC’s series about backstage Broadway, comes with New York and Hollywood names off screen (Steven Spielberg, Therese Rebeck) and on (Debra Messing and Brian d’Arcy James). Given that pedigree, you’re expecting to be bowled over by the pilot, but it ends up feeling like a collage of devices from the zillions of previous backstage plays, musicals and movies. However, be patient — Smash gets better as it goes along and by Episode 3 it shows signs of becoming an addictive pleasure along the lines of this season’s Revenge.

  • Lori Rackl

    Pop some Dramamine before watching ABC's new horror series, The River, because the shaky camera work is more likely to make you seasick than scared. You can, however, skip the sleeping pill. The River's two-hour premiere should suffice. Billed as a thriller, the show tries hard to be terrifying and eerie in a Paranormal Activity kind of way. It ends up being hokey and, even worse, boring.

  • Robert Lloyd

    Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele, veterans of Fox's sketch comedy MADtv, have a new series of their own, Comedy Central's Key & Peele. It is a genial, at times almost genteel, half-hour in which the pair's obvious niceness shines through even their more pugnacious characters. (Key's version of road rage is to shout, "Selfish!") In a roundabout way, that's the point. The sketches are consistently smart and smartly acted and flow easily from ordinary premises to weird conclusions.

  • Hank Stuever

    Discovery's Bering Sea Gold doesn’t seem at first like it has crossed any new reality TV frontier, relying on elements and structure familiar to the form. Enticingly (to the network), it combines the ocean and the gold and the cold and the reactive testosterone among bad-tempered desperados. To which I am surprised to cry: Eureka, they’ve found it! Bering Sea Gold is a testament to how thoroughly absorbing the genre can still be, when it’s done right.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Kiefer Sutherland displays his softer side in Fox's Touch, a touchy-feely drama merging paranormal, spiritual and sweetly familial elements. shows off his acting chops, long forgotten, in scene after scene. It's heavier lifting than usual for the actor who was often reduced to caricature in 24. Sutherland is all about vulnerability in a show whose goal is nothing short of proving the interconnectedness of human life. We'll see if audiences can tolerate the notion of profound interrelatedness as weekly entertainment.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad