SBE To Join FCC Spectrum Forum After All

The Society of Broadcast Engineers' invitation to participate in the FCC Broadcast Engineering Forum comes after SBE President Vincent Lopez last week sent an open letter to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski complaining of being left out.
TVNewsCheck,

When the FCC Broadcast Engineering Forum convenes at the agency's Washington headquarters tomorrow, the Society of Broadcast Engineers will be represented after all.

According to SBE Executive Director John Poray, two members of the society will participate in the day-long forum aimed at exploring ways of using broadcast spectrum more efficiently and perhaps giving some of it back so that it can be repurposed for wireless broadband.

Story continues after the ad

The  reps: Ralph Hogan, associate general manager, Rio Salado College Division of Public Service, Tempe, Ariz., who also represents the SBE at the Advanced Television Systems Committee; and Joe Snelson, VP and director of engineering, Meredith Local Media Group.

SBE had to work to get invitations from the FCC.

After the FCC staff ignored SBE entreaties, SBE President Vincent Lopez last week sent an open letter to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski complaining of being left out.

"At worst, it appears that the participants in the panel were chosen in order to provide the commission with the appearance of an industry consensus, evidencing a predetermined outcome," Lopez charged.

The letter seems to have done the trick. An invitation to SBE followed shortly and was quickly accepted.

Hogan will sit on the VHF reception panel, while Snelson participates on the spectrum repacking panel.

For a full list of the forum participants and the schedule, click here.

Edit Article

Comments (9) -

David David posted a year ago
This whole plan is a conjured up solution to a problem that does not exist. This "plan" will hit a brick wall with the dramatic shift in Congress this November.
TVGuy Nickname posted a year ago
What DAVID DAVID said. I just hope he's a prophet!
Chip Harwood posted a year ago
DAVID DAVID change in November please for many many reason anti-business anti-broadcaster are two
TVRFPE Nickname posted a year ago
In what way would Republican control of Congress diminish the wireless industry's desire to take spectrum from broadcast television? The wireless industry would merely revise its selling points to echo themes popular in Republican circles and continue on with its campaign.
PSIPthing Nickname posted a year ago
actually, the wireless industry has no such desire. You might not have been paying attention. This is the federal goveronemnt -- recent auction proceeds and results notwithstanding -- thinking that there might be interest in more spectrum for wireless at some point in the future, and kicking broadcasting's ass right now. David David had it just about right, at least in the first sentence. Time will tell what happens in November, but the trends are decidely against the D's.
Snap Nickname posted a year ago
We have Ivan Seidenberg of Verizon saying that they don't want any more. Of course Verizon just paid 4.7 Billion for 20 MHz of the 700 MHz band, and if the FCC dumps a bunch more spectrum on the market, that spectrum will lose value and Verizon will lose its current advantage.
PSIPthing Nickname posted a year ago
and, if Verizon doesn't need new spectrum and they're the largest, and AT&T has plenty of spectrum in reserve with whch to provide misservice, the big bidders will be ...?
Snap Nickname posted a year ago
I hope that for whatever reason the plan hits a wall. The question is are those of us who are against reallocation going to be able to rally Congressional opposition to the kill broadcast TV agenda of these elitists.
AmericaRight Nickname posted a year ago
What a joke! The public portion runs from 3p-6p on a Friday afternoon in DC? Has anyone ever been in DC on a Friday afternoon? Everyone has left for home by 3p. And the public gets to speak or ask questions for all of 45 minutes from 5:15p-6p? I'd wager there will be no one in the audience at that time. Which is probably just what the organizers at the FCC want. This forum is hidden in plain sight and will accomplish nothing. And since when is "by invitation only" the proper way to solicit industry input? EVERYONE with an interest should be heard and should have standing to participate in the panels. This meeting could just as well be held in the Kremlin for all the public interest it will represent.

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2905.66 +45.98 (+1.61%)
NYSE 8060.43 +115.00 (+1.45%)
S&P 500 1344.90 +19.36 (+1.46%)
Updated 02/04 4:11p ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for February 3, 2012
  • 1.
    3.9/11
  • 2.
    3.5/9
  • 3.
    2.5/7
  • 4.
    1.5/4
  • 5.
    1.5/4
  • 6.
    0.9/2
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • Robert Lloyd

    Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele, veterans of Fox's sketch comedy MADtv, have a new series of their own, Comedy Central's Key & Peele. It is a genial, at times almost genteel, half-hour in which the pair's obvious niceness shines through even their more pugnacious characters. (Key's version of road rage is to shout, "Selfish!") In a roundabout way, that's the point. The sketches are consistently smart and smartly acted and flow easily from ordinary premises to weird conclusions.

  • Hank Stuever

    Discovery's Bering Sea Gold doesn’t seem at first like it has crossed any new reality TV frontier, relying on elements and structure familiar to the form. Enticingly (to the network), it combines the ocean and the gold and the cold and the reactive testosterone among bad-tempered desperados. To which I am surprised to cry: Eureka, they’ve found it! Bering Sea Gold is a testament to how thoroughly absorbing the genre can still be, when it’s done right.

  • Neil Genzlinger

    All Star Dealers, Discovery Channel's sports-memorabilia addition to the bloated auction/pawnshop/storage locker subgenre of reality television, should have been a winner, with endless stories to draw on and a built-in fan base. But rather than find its own formula, it was content to borrow from existing shows, and it borrowed all the wrong things.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Kiefer Sutherland displays his softer side in Fox's Touch, a touchy-feely drama merging paranormal, spiritual and sweetly familial elements. shows off his acting chops, long forgotten, in scene after scene. It's heavier lifting than usual for the actor who was often reduced to caricature in 24. Sutherland is all about vulnerability in a show whose goal is nothing short of proving the interconnectedness of human life. We'll see if audiences can tolerate the notion of profound interrelatedness as weekly entertainment.

  • Tim Goodman

    Let's jump right to the most obvious of all sentiments when it comes to HBO's new horse racing/gambling series Luck: Do not bet against David Milch in this one. Like a lot of HBO series, Luck will require patience. It's telling a dense story with nuanced characters and it doesn't feel the need to rush in, like a network series, and hammer home the main themes. But each episode is more enriching, more engrossing than the last and there's Hoffman's superb turn at the forefront, even though his story unfolds with the least rush. Luck is a smart and ambitious series that looks to truly pay off in the home stretch.

  • Mike Hale

    The timing of FX's animated series Unsupervised is unfortunate. A kind of reversed Beavis and Butt-Head — in which the teenage heroes, while losers in just about every way, are also social strivers yearning for suburban domesticity and dispensing Oprah Winfrey-style affirmations — it has the bad luck of coming along three months after the original was revived by MTV. The new show looks awfully pale by comparison.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad