Legal Memo by Michael D. Berg

Fallout Could Impact Political Ad Ruling

Page 2 of 4

--asked for comments on the effects of the ruling on proposed new rules for "coordinated" (with candidates) communications before holding hearings on them. The FEC has been trying to adopt those rules for seven years.

--issued a Feb. 5 statement that due to the ruling the FEC is no longer enforcing laws and rules  prohibiting corporations and labor unions from making independent expenditures (broadcasts not coordinated with a candidate or campaign and expressly advocating election or defeat of clearly identified federal candidates) or electioneering communications (TV or radio broadcasts, cable or satellite communications that refer to a clearly identified federal candidate, aired within 30 days of a primary or 60 days of a general election, and able to be received by at least 50,000 people in a state). 

Story continues after the ad

    Congressional Activity

    At least 16 separate bills have been introduced in the House and Senate to address aspects of the Citizens result.

    Even before the Supreme Court issued Citizens United, more than 100 members of Congress signed on to the Fair Elections Now Act. It would create a system of public financing of Congressional campaigns. Legislators, especially in the House, are seeking freedom from constant pressure to raise campaign funds. 

    Members of Congress were not alone in this. Two days after the Court ruled, 40 corporate executives wrote Congressional leaders (through the group Fair Elections Now) urging passage of such legislation. Among them were leaders of Ben & Jerry's, Playboy Enterprises, Delta Airlines, Hasbro and MetLife.

    "Members of Congress already spend too much time raising money from large contributors," the executives said. "And often, many of us individually are on the receiving end of solicitation phone calls from members of Congress. With additional money flowing into the system due to the court's decision, the fund-raising pressure on members of Congress will only increase."

    In the Senate, a proposal would finance congressional campaigns with a fee on businesses having more than $10 million in government contracts. In the House, a bill would use money obtained by the government from the auctioning of spectrum that TV stations had to return when they switched to all-digital operation.

    Probably the most comprehensive proposal is being written by Senator Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and assistant to the Speaker of the House. Closely coordinated with the White House, this legislation has not been introduced at this writing but its principal authors released a summary on Feb. 11.

    The main provisions:

    Foreign influence: Banning corporations from spending money on U.S. elections if they are 20 percent or more foreign-owned, or a majority of their board of directors is foreign principals, or their U.S. operations or political decision-making is controlled by a foreign entity, including a foreign government.

    "Pay to Play": A prohibition against government contractors and TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) recipients (federal relief for distressed companies due to the recession) from making political expenditures with taxpayer funds. The ban would apply to TARP recipients until the money is repaid.

    Enhanced disclaimers to identify ad sponsors: A requirement that corporate political ads include their CEOs on camera to say they "approve this message" as candidates must continue to do under Citizens United.  The "top funder" of the ad must also record a "stand-by-your-ad disclaimer" and the top five contributors that donate for political purposes would be listed on-air at the end.

    Strengthened disclosure to the FEC (and, through it, the public): Require separate "political broadcast spending" bank accounts by corporations/unions, and organizations formed under sections 501(c)4, 5 or 6 or 527 of  federal law. All funds spent or transferred from the accounts would have to be reported to the FEC and become public.

      Other provisions:

      --Require all political expenditures by a corporation to be disclosed within 24 hours on the company website, and to shareholders in quarterly and annual reports.

      --Require federally registered lobbyists to disclose information on all campaign expenditures over $1,000.

      --Strengthen current coordination rules for House and Senate campaigns by banning coordination between a corporation or union and candidates on ads referencing a congressional candidate within 90 days of the start of the primary-through-general election season. For all federal elections, coordination would be prohibited, regardless of timing, when the ads promote, support, attack, or oppose a candidate.

      --Expand the lowest unit rate. If a corporation buys broadcast, cable or satellite TV ads that support or oppose a candidate, the candidate or his or her political party or authorized committee would be entitled to lowest unit rate for that media market, perhaps including outside the 45- and 60-day lowest unit rate periods if the corporate ads run then. 

        Note that some provisions of the Schumer/Van Hollen summary have been introduced in both houses as stand-alone bills.

        Edit Article

        Comments (1) -

        Vincent Pepper posted a year ago
        Well done, Michael.. Vince

        Classifieds

        The Market

        Symbol Last Change (%)
        Nasdaq 2915.86 +11.78 (+0.41%)
        NYSE 8082.98 +13.27 (+0.16%)
        S&P 500 1349.96 +2.91 (+0.22%)
        Updated 02/08 5:48p ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
        Source: Financial Content

        Ratings

        Overnights, adults 18-49 for February 7, 2012
        • 1.
          3.1/8
        • 2.
          3.0/8
        • 3.
          2.4/6
        • 4.
          2.0/5
        • 5.
          1.6/4
        • 6.
          0.6/1
        Source: Nielsen
        Reviews
        Opinions
        Features
        • Neil Genzlinger

          Smash, NBC’s series about backstage Broadway, comes with New York and Hollywood names off screen (Steven Spielberg, Therese Rebeck) and on (Debra Messing and Brian d’Arcy James). Given that pedigree, you’re expecting to be bowled over by the pilot, but it ends up feeling like a collage of devices from the zillions of previous backstage plays, musicals and movies. However, be patient — Smash gets better as it goes along and by Episode 3 it shows signs of becoming an addictive pleasure along the lines of this season’s Revenge.

        • Lori Rackl

          Pop some Dramamine before watching ABC's new horror series, The River, because the shaky camera work is more likely to make you seasick than scared. You can, however, skip the sleeping pill. The River's two-hour premiere should suffice. Billed as a thriller, the show tries hard to be terrifying and eerie in a Paranormal Activity kind of way. It ends up being hokey and, even worse, boring.

        • Robert Lloyd

          Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele, veterans of Fox's sketch comedy MADtv, have a new series of their own, Comedy Central's Key & Peele. It is a genial, at times almost genteel, half-hour in which the pair's obvious niceness shines through even their more pugnacious characters. (Key's version of road rage is to shout, "Selfish!") In a roundabout way, that's the point. The sketches are consistently smart and smartly acted and flow easily from ordinary premises to weird conclusions.

        • Hank Stuever

          Discovery's Bering Sea Gold doesn’t seem at first like it has crossed any new reality TV frontier, relying on elements and structure familiar to the form. Enticingly (to the network), it combines the ocean and the gold and the cold and the reactive testosterone among bad-tempered desperados. To which I am surprised to cry: Eureka, they’ve found it! Bering Sea Gold is a testament to how thoroughly absorbing the genre can still be, when it’s done right.

        • Joanne Ostrow

          Kiefer Sutherland displays his softer side in Fox's Touch, a touchy-feely drama merging paranormal, spiritual and sweetly familial elements. shows off his acting chops, long forgotten, in scene after scene. It's heavier lifting than usual for the actor who was often reduced to caricature in 24. Sutherland is all about vulnerability in a show whose goal is nothing short of proving the interconnectedness of human life. We'll see if audiences can tolerate the notion of profound interrelatedness as weekly entertainment.

        This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad