NATPE Smaller, But No Less Vital To TV
You come from the ranks of TV broadcasters who have had a couple of rough years. What do you think they need to get back on track?
If you had a shoe store and you had the same shoes in the window for three or four or 25 years, would that necessarily be the best way to market your shoe store?
You don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water, but there's been too much product in the exact same time periods on too many stations. There have been too many stations over the years that found it a lot easier to extend to the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh hour of news rather than put on fresh programming. They have not freshened up their inventory.
I have also felt for a long time that if broadcasters don't figure out ways to get some sort of retransmission money that ultimately they were fighting a losing battle because ESPN, with its $4 and $5 in subscription fees, was going to be able to get everything.
Well, it sounds like they're getting those fees now.
Yes. They are. The way the cable business is structured right now is essentially a false economy with cable networks that are doing relatively minimal ratings but still getting maybe pennies and nickels and dimes [per subscriber per month from cable operators]. It's just about enough to keep them alive.

Comments (3) - Post a comment