Executive Session with Rick Feldman

NATPE Smaller, But No Less Vital To TV

Page 3 of 3

You come from the ranks of TV broadcasters who have had a couple of rough years. What do you think they need to get back on track?

If you had a shoe store and you had the same shoes in the window for three or four or 25 years, would that necessarily be the best way to market your shoe store?

Story continues after the ad

You don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water, but there's been too much product in the exact same time periods on too many stations. There have been too many stations over the years that found it a lot easier to extend to the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh hour of news rather than put on fresh programming. They have not freshened up their inventory.

I have also felt for a long time that if broadcasters don't figure out ways to get some sort of retransmission money that ultimately they were fighting a losing battle because ESPN, with its $4 and $5 in subscription fees, was going to be able to get everything.

Well, it sounds like they're getting those fees now.

Yes. They are. The way the cable business is structured right now is essentially a false economy with cable networks that are doing relatively minimal ratings but still getting maybe pennies and nickels and dimes [per subscriber per month from cable operators]. It's just about enough to keep them alive.

Edit Article

Comments (3) -

RustbeltAlumnus2 Nickname posted over 2 years ago
I was a NATPE member for ten years in the mid 1970s to mid 1980s, so I'm qualified to comment. The key benefit of attending the conference was getting to see the shows, but that went away with the U-matic 3/4 inch cassette. Syndicators can show "program executives" (i.e., GMs, GSMs, no PDs anymore) their wares online. Most of the deals take place without much need for face-to-face. Another benefit was learning from people, which is just as easy to do with coveritlive.com or dimdim.com (minus the schmoozing). I fondly remember the gargantuan displays of shrimp, star-studded IRIS shows, and hookers in the suites. But that vanished with the largess of the license-to-print-money power of producers-distributors-exhibitors. NATPE is every bit as relevant in 2010 as is "broadcasting" -- which ain't saying much. Maybe the place to be now is NCTA (The Cable Show).
PSIPthing Nickname posted over 2 years ago
so, we can find hookers in the hospitality suites at NCTA?
MediaLifer Nickname posted over 2 years ago
In the 'good ole days' GM's and PD's knew their markets, their station audiences and bought programming to fit their audience flow and appeal. Now in the world of 'dumb down America' it's one size fits all. You see in reinforced in news. Sets look the same, spot news dominance, pre-packaged promotion, and worse - no personality. So broadcasting slides in share of viewing with affiliates hoping for the networks to save them; and the networks know they have all the clout to grab retrans, inventory, and ask for compensation. What a business!

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2915.86 +11.78 (+0.41%)
NYSE 8082.98 +13.27 (+0.16%)
S&P 500 1349.96 +2.91 (+0.22%)
Updated 02/08 5:42p ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for February 7, 2012
  • 1.
    3.1/8
  • 2.
    3.0/8
  • 3.
    2.4/6
  • 4.
    2.0/5
  • 5.
    1.6/4
  • 6.
    0.6/1
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • Neil Genzlinger

    Smash, NBC’s series about backstage Broadway, comes with New York and Hollywood names off screen (Steven Spielberg, Therese Rebeck) and on (Debra Messing and Brian d’Arcy James). Given that pedigree, you’re expecting to be bowled over by the pilot, but it ends up feeling like a collage of devices from the zillions of previous backstage plays, musicals and movies. However, be patient — Smash gets better as it goes along and by Episode 3 it shows signs of becoming an addictive pleasure along the lines of this season’s Revenge.

  • Lori Rackl

    Pop some Dramamine before watching ABC's new horror series, The River, because the shaky camera work is more likely to make you seasick than scared. You can, however, skip the sleeping pill. The River's two-hour premiere should suffice. Billed as a thriller, the show tries hard to be terrifying and eerie in a Paranormal Activity kind of way. It ends up being hokey and, even worse, boring.

  • Robert Lloyd

    Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele, veterans of Fox's sketch comedy MADtv, have a new series of their own, Comedy Central's Key & Peele. It is a genial, at times almost genteel, half-hour in which the pair's obvious niceness shines through even their more pugnacious characters. (Key's version of road rage is to shout, "Selfish!") In a roundabout way, that's the point. The sketches are consistently smart and smartly acted and flow easily from ordinary premises to weird conclusions.

  • Hank Stuever

    Discovery's Bering Sea Gold doesn’t seem at first like it has crossed any new reality TV frontier, relying on elements and structure familiar to the form. Enticingly (to the network), it combines the ocean and the gold and the cold and the reactive testosterone among bad-tempered desperados. To which I am surprised to cry: Eureka, they’ve found it! Bering Sea Gold is a testament to how thoroughly absorbing the genre can still be, when it’s done right.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Kiefer Sutherland displays his softer side in Fox's Touch, a touchy-feely drama merging paranormal, spiritual and sweetly familial elements. shows off his acting chops, long forgotten, in scene after scene. It's heavier lifting than usual for the actor who was often reduced to caricature in 24. Sutherland is all about vulnerability in a show whose goal is nothing short of proving the interconnectedness of human life. We'll see if audiences can tolerate the notion of profound interrelatedness as weekly entertainment.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad