Executive Session with Rick Feldman

NATPE Smaller, But No Less Vital To TV

Page 2 of 3

That said, what kind of syndication presence do you expect at the show this year?

I know for a fact that the people that represent the major station groups and the people that represent the major sellers are all going to be at NATPE and talking to each other. How much actual business gets done, I don't know. There will be renewals, there will be library deals.

Story continues after the ad

A guy like John Nogowski [of CBS Television Distribution], who has got tons of product, should be busy. There are VOD channels, there are new cable channels, there are channels all over the world that will be looking into CBS products. We have all these people from Latin America that are looking for new product.

I'm not looking for the most robust market that we have ever seen before, but I think maybe even in bad times people need to get in every single opportunity where they can get in front of people.

So each of the major syndicators will have suites in the hotel this year?

Yes, most of them will. I don't want to go into detail. Everybody is doing it a different way. The bottom line is that we will create an environment where people are going to come. How they're going to come and how they're going to meet, that's up to them.

None of the big boys are going to be on the floor, right?

Right. None of the big boys are going to be on the floor. You know, we're moving to Miami next year. There, everybody's going to be in an ocean-front suite.

What about the CES and the NAB? Seeing the same sort of future marketplace as you, they have been trying to cut into your turf by soliciting programmers to come to their shows. What effect has that had on NATPE?

It honestly hasn't. NAB exists in its own universe and we exist in ours. Ours is in January; theirs comes in April. While there is definitely duplication, the group heads who feel that they need to look at the technological aspects of what NAB has, they go to NAB. Those people that are involved in talking to advertisers and to advertising agencies and agents, they go to NATPE.

What about CES?

Sony has always been a big player there. NBC is still involved. CNBC or MSNBC does a live show there, but in terms of the minions that they were bringing over the last couple of years, I know from my friends at NBC that's not happening anymore. I think that everybody's gone back to their knitting. These guys do their tech thing and we do our programming thing.

Is it an accident that once again the NAB board meeting conflicts with NATPE?

You would have to ask them and they will tell you that it's an accident. Since it's the second time in three years, my guess is that I'm not so sure it is an accident and it is not particularly appreciated on this end.

Why the switch to Miami in 2011?

The most vibrant part of our marketplace is the Latin market and, to some degree, the Canadian market. First of all, changing venues after seven or eight years in the same place was a good thing and so is going to a place where we can control the entire hotel and Eden Roc next door. Everybody that you meet over a three-day period will be in the television business and people will not have to wander a half an hour from the suite to the floors.

With regard to creating an environment that's going to allow people to do business in a much more constructive, efficient way, Miami is going to offer that. Not to mention that I'm always somewhat jealous when I go to Banff or Cannes and I go, god, this is so beautiful. Why can't we have something that's beautiful?

But isn't moving so far east going to further strain the Hollywood connection?

Yes. It probably does to some extent. There are risks to doing everything. Part of the risk of staying in Las Vegas is that I don't get as many Europeans as I would like. Going from Berlin to Miami Beach in January sounds like a pretty exciting prospect to some people.        

If you can change the venue, why can't you change the time so it syncs up better with the needs of the syndicators? They generally bring out their new product in the fall.

We've talked to people about that. The fall is really not a good time to do it. January is the time to do it. The reason it's January is because new shows go on the air in September and you need the November book. You need three or four months to evaluate what you're going to need and what you're not going to need. So frankly, doing it in the fall is really not the right time.

Edit Article

Comments (3) -

RustbeltAlumnus2 Nickname posted over 2 years ago
I was a NATPE member for ten years in the mid 1970s to mid 1980s, so I'm qualified to comment. The key benefit of attending the conference was getting to see the shows, but that went away with the U-matic 3/4 inch cassette. Syndicators can show "program executives" (i.e., GMs, GSMs, no PDs anymore) their wares online. Most of the deals take place without much need for face-to-face. Another benefit was learning from people, which is just as easy to do with coveritlive.com or dimdim.com (minus the schmoozing). I fondly remember the gargantuan displays of shrimp, star-studded IRIS shows, and hookers in the suites. But that vanished with the largess of the license-to-print-money power of producers-distributors-exhibitors. NATPE is every bit as relevant in 2010 as is "broadcasting" -- which ain't saying much. Maybe the place to be now is NCTA (The Cable Show).
PSIPthing Nickname posted over 2 years ago
so, we can find hookers in the hospitality suites at NCTA?
MediaLifer Nickname posted over 2 years ago
In the 'good ole days' GM's and PD's knew their markets, their station audiences and bought programming to fit their audience flow and appeal. Now in the world of 'dumb down America' it's one size fits all. You see in reinforced in news. Sets look the same, spot news dominance, pre-packaged promotion, and worse - no personality. So broadcasting slides in share of viewing with affiliates hoping for the networks to save them; and the networks know they have all the clout to grab retrans, inventory, and ask for compensation. What a business!

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2915.86 +11.78 (+0.41%)
NYSE 8082.98 +13.27 (+0.16%)
S&P 500 1349.96 +2.91 (+0.22%)
Updated 02/08 5:42p ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for February 7, 2012
  • 1.
    3.1/8
  • 2.
    3.0/8
  • 3.
    2.4/6
  • 4.
    2.0/5
  • 5.
    1.6/4
  • 6.
    0.6/1
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • Neil Genzlinger

    Smash, NBC’s series about backstage Broadway, comes with New York and Hollywood names off screen (Steven Spielberg, Therese Rebeck) and on (Debra Messing and Brian d’Arcy James). Given that pedigree, you’re expecting to be bowled over by the pilot, but it ends up feeling like a collage of devices from the zillions of previous backstage plays, musicals and movies. However, be patient — Smash gets better as it goes along and by Episode 3 it shows signs of becoming an addictive pleasure along the lines of this season’s Revenge.

  • Lori Rackl

    Pop some Dramamine before watching ABC's new horror series, The River, because the shaky camera work is more likely to make you seasick than scared. You can, however, skip the sleeping pill. The River's two-hour premiere should suffice. Billed as a thriller, the show tries hard to be terrifying and eerie in a Paranormal Activity kind of way. It ends up being hokey and, even worse, boring.

  • Robert Lloyd

    Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele, veterans of Fox's sketch comedy MADtv, have a new series of their own, Comedy Central's Key & Peele. It is a genial, at times almost genteel, half-hour in which the pair's obvious niceness shines through even their more pugnacious characters. (Key's version of road rage is to shout, "Selfish!") In a roundabout way, that's the point. The sketches are consistently smart and smartly acted and flow easily from ordinary premises to weird conclusions.

  • Hank Stuever

    Discovery's Bering Sea Gold doesn’t seem at first like it has crossed any new reality TV frontier, relying on elements and structure familiar to the form. Enticingly (to the network), it combines the ocean and the gold and the cold and the reactive testosterone among bad-tempered desperados. To which I am surprised to cry: Eureka, they’ve found it! Bering Sea Gold is a testament to how thoroughly absorbing the genre can still be, when it’s done right.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Kiefer Sutherland displays his softer side in Fox's Touch, a touchy-feely drama merging paranormal, spiritual and sweetly familial elements. shows off his acting chops, long forgotten, in scene after scene. It's heavier lifting than usual for the actor who was often reduced to caricature in 24. Sutherland is all about vulnerability in a show whose goal is nothing short of proving the interconnectedness of human life. We'll see if audiences can tolerate the notion of profound interrelatedness as weekly entertainment.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad