TVnewscheck Focus on business

TV Stations Rebound, But How High?

Page 2 of 2

A recent report from David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poors, adds perspective: "The economy seems to be coming out of the longest and deepest recession in postwar history, but we expect the recovery to be slow," Wyss writes. "The recent data have turned less upbeat, as the initial impact of the stimulus package boosted third-quarter numbers. Still, the continued calming of financial markets and the stabilization of housing suggest the recession is technically over, even if it won't feel like it for a few more months."

It has been a particularly rough period for station groups. While bankruptcies are up across the board in all sectors, station groups account for an unusually high number of filings over the past 18 months. Among them: Tribune, Young, Pappas, New Vision, Freedom and Equity Media.

Story continues after the ad

There's a lull at the moment, says Shea, but filings may ramp up again next year. "A number of broadcasters have had covenants relaxed or in forbearance periods running from now to sometime in early to mid 2010 at which time covenants step down again," he says.

A second factor for the pause: "Lenders are waiting to see what the third quarter looks like," Shea says. "No one is taking any formal action right now."

If there's a motto for the broadcast business this year, it's "less down is the new up."

"Stocks are up, but I don't know that business is up that much over last year," says Gabelli & Co.'s Lucas. "The decline in the core business appears to be abating. My only issue is I'm getting tired of less down being the new up. I'd like to see the new up."

That's probably going to have to wait until the second or third quarter of next year. And even then, it's likely to be up so little as to be nearly invisible.

BIA/Kelsey projects 2010 revenues for virtually all the U.S. television markets will increase about $100 million, to $16.2 billion. That's a 0.6 percent increase spread across 200-plus television markets and so far off the recent industry peak of $22.8 billion in 2006 that it's a little surprising that stocks didn't fall further.

Others are more optimistic. Each fall, the Television Bureau of Advertising reviews the revenue forecasts for the upcoming year of industry analysts and sales rep firms. The consensus for 2010: 3.6 percent to 6.1 percent.

With upticks in stock and debt prices, can a restart of the M&A market be far behind? Depends on whom you ask.

Shea projects private equity will be the bellwether: "I see the first M&A deal getting done by a private equity investor that buys a [station] platform and pays cash on the expectation they'll finance it later."

Schmaeling has a somewhat different take. "There's no doubt that for companies like LIN, credit availability is significantly better than back in March. Does that lead to M&A? I think it likely does over time, when there's more stability in the outlook.

"I don't share the view that some of my colleagues have that private equity is going to come back into the sector in a big way," Schmaeling adds. "A lot of private equity money got burned in the broadcast space in a big way."

Edit Article

Comments (17) -

Rocker Nickname posted over 2 years ago
It's great that the recession is, or will end. But nobody's calling for a roaring recovery. Moreover, when assessing the prospects for the broadcast sector, you have to look to secular changes occuring in media, marketing and advertising generally, and television specifically. Audience shares will continue to decline. Advertisers will continue to shift $ to interactive media where R.O.I. is easier to calculate (although good news is there is a reawakening to the value of brands and the fact that too much focus on the bottom of the funnel ultimately backfires if there's not also an effort at the top). Bottom line though - like newspapers, the broadcasting industry is still headed for the abyss. That was apparent even before the recession - just accelerated by 2-5 years. Good news: After more pain, and a period of major consolidation, there is a future for those left standing. I would look to stocks/companies that can articulate a vision/plan, evince flexibility and an ability to adapt, and have resources sufficient to execute. We're not talking huge investments, but there has to be an R&D capacity, and more importantly, a willingness to embrace aggressive business transformation at all levels.
formergm Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Stations will continue to lose audience at a steady rate. Most local newscasts are dreadful, and adults 25-54 know it.
TVinmyblood Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Based on your comments I understand why you're a "formergm"
formergm Nickname posted over 2 years ago
"TVinmyblood" - Sorry you feel the need to make a personal attack. You obviously work and live in a fantasy land. It's heartbreaking to watch local TV stations slowly dying from their own mismanagement and negligence.
tjxx Nickname posted over 2 years ago
I think these guys are all delusional. The seismic shift has occurred in the local broadcast market and they better learn to deal with it or can anyone say"General Motors/ Chrysler". The days of mass media spending are behind you. Dont these people know that the 18-49's are spending twice the amout of time with a computer than their tv set. They still have not figured out a profitable scenario for the internet and are using it as a step child to their diminishing news product,assuming they have one. Live sports and entertainment is the future of broadcast tv. I really think they have missed the market and let the cuts continue! Anyone who knows the broadcast business knows that egos run rampant and preception is always more important than reality. They did not see the change in front of them occurring fast enough and now they are paying the price .It's too late, get used to it boys!
PhillyPhlash Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Fact is, broadcast digichannels are breathing new life into the station biz. I'm forsaking my Comcast-connected HDTV to go upstairs to the bedroom set to watch "Retro TV", a digichannel carried by WFMZ Allentown -- a channel that Comcast isn't carrying. (That is, on nights when the OTA signal is robust enough to reach me.) Also watching "This TV" on WPHL-17 digi, and "Y-Arts" from WHYY (also having DTV OTA reception problems with their signals.) OTA broadcast going multichannel -- for free -- is being kept something of a secret. Why isn't there more promotion of these valuable programming offerings? Is it because the money men behind big media conglomerates are willing to sacrifice the station business to make all TV, pay TV? Prove me wrong, broadcasters -- promote your product!
PSIPthing Nickname posted over 2 years ago
it's always funny to read you extending your personal conditions to the market in general. This is pure personal anecdote. Most people who watch television prefer network television, and fresh content. This is "not exactly" what ThisTv and Retro TV provide, unless one is in a time warp. And, their ratings seem to show it, to the extent they even have ratings. It can be argued that the stations offering these channels are sacrificing their transport streams to show retro content when they could be developing and experimenting with the content that will thrive in the post-broadcast-network world. Note that the broadcast networks aren't exactly programming new content on Saturday.
PhillyPhlash Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Well, at least there's no "black helicopters" in the paid troll's response today.... doubt that new shows can be developed on the budget that allows RTV to satisfy viewers' need for Rockford Files re-runs...
PSIPthing Nickname posted over 2 years ago
I wonder who you think, in that fetid mnd of yours, pays me? I got my fill of the Rockford Files three decades ago, and if I want to relive the bard of paradise cove, it's available on dvd.
tjxx Nickname posted over 2 years ago
A very wise man told me years ago that if you were not in the "software business". the "idea" business that you would be vulnerable. What ( product)shows do local broadcast stations really produce except local news or an additional community event/parade/sporting event? People are turning away from local news for the internet, why? They get their news on their timeline not the stations. Duh! Local stations are distributors of network product and the gravy days of their high profit margins and high stock prices(if they are a public company) are over ! In a general sense you would have to be crazy to invest in any stock of a local media company! It's a license to lose $$ as these companies will continue to see.
formergm Nickname posted over 2 years ago
"tjxx" - You are spot on. Let me add one comment to yours regarding people turning away from local news for the internet. IMO - stations are literally forcing viewers away. How? First - a mind-numbing commercial and promotional glut. The average station airs an incredible 11minutes of non program time in every half hour newscast. 20 years ago that figure was around 8 minutes. Secong - content is largely defined by crime (Somewhere in the DMA there must be a domestic homicide.), car wrecks, and weather hype. The typical station airs 3 weather segments in every half-hour newscast - adding up to around 6 minutes. You can be sure that stray shower 80 miles away will be highlighted using all the station's weather toys. So - about `1/3 of the total content is devoted to weather hype. The above is a recipe for continued viewer erosion - as you can clearly see in almost all market rating books.
PhillyPhlash Nickname posted over 2 years ago
tjxx/formergm combo = lame psy op. No way either of you were ever in the broadcasting biz. So why are you here? http://nowpublic.com/world/govt-fusion-center-spying-pretext-harass-and-censor
Doubtful Nickname posted over 2 years ago
It's all about content. Local stations need to take back control of their destinies by producing more original content. For some stations that will be more news, for other stations it will be local entertainment, still other stations will embrace advertiser-supported, locally-produced fare. As network and syndicated programming continues to lose audience shares due to a combination of overexposure of reruns, bland first-run, and non-syndcateable reality programming, locally-produced content will provide stations with their only true differentiator. Leveraging locally-produced content on multiple distribution platforms to provide local businesses (local direct, not agency) with affordable marketing solutions is the model for the future for local stations. Original, exclusive, locally-relevant is the answer.
PSIPthing Nickname posted over 2 years ago
but, the key is how to do this profitably. I lament the dearth of non-news local programming in the markets I can sample off-air. Being largely passive repeaters of content generated elsewhere just binds you to a network and not necessarily your local audience, because you have no control over what the network feeds you. It's not unlike a McDonalds's franchisee ..
tjxx Nickname posted over 2 years ago
Hey PhillyPhlash. I ran stations and sales departments all over the country. You are in denial. Hope it all works out for you in the socalled "broadcasting business". I saw the freight train coming and moved on to other successful businesses. You are still in the caboose! Their is plenty of life after broadcasting and you better wake up!
formergm Nickname posted over 2 years ago
PillyPhlash: I was a successful GM in three medium market NBC and CBS affliliated stations - and now happily semi-retired. You are certainly entitled to your opinion - as are tjxx and me. It would be helpful if you were less judgemental and more coherent.
David Jacquemin posted over 2 years ago
Producing localized, non-news content, profitability, will only occur when local videographers are shown "how-to" produce quality, broadcast standards content. Online software solutions have yet to create an interface that's attractive (non-threatening) and easy to use, but it will happen in the near term. Additionally, developing a comprehensive, long-term community strategy, in conjunction with UGC, is essential, costs little and, is easy to implement. Engaging our audiences, seeking their creative solutions-and they do have them-is a good place to start.

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2915.86 +11.78 (+0.41%)
NYSE 8082.98 +13.27 (+0.16%)
S&P 500 1349.96 +2.91 (+0.22%)
Updated 02/08 5:31ä ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for 2月 7, 2012
  • 1.
    3.1/8
  • 2.
    3.0/8
  • 3.
    2.4/6
  • 4.
    2.0/5
  • 5.
    1.6/4
  • 6.
    0.6/1
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • Neil Genzlinger

    Smash, NBC’s series about backstage Broadway, comes with New York and Hollywood names off screen (Steven Spielberg, Therese Rebeck) and on (Debra Messing and Brian d’Arcy James). Given that pedigree, you’re expecting to be bowled over by the pilot, but it ends up feeling like a collage of devices from the zillions of previous backstage plays, musicals and movies. However, be patient — Smash gets better as it goes along and by Episode 3 it shows signs of becoming an addictive pleasure along the lines of this season’s Revenge.

  • Lori Rackl

    Pop some Dramamine before watching ABC's new horror series, The River, because the shaky camera work is more likely to make you seasick than scared. You can, however, skip the sleeping pill. The River's two-hour premiere should suffice. Billed as a thriller, the show tries hard to be terrifying and eerie in a Paranormal Activity kind of way. It ends up being hokey and, even worse, boring.

  • Robert Lloyd

    Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele, veterans of Fox's sketch comedy MADtv, have a new series of their own, Comedy Central's Key & Peele. It is a genial, at times almost genteel, half-hour in which the pair's obvious niceness shines through even their more pugnacious characters. (Key's version of road rage is to shout, "Selfish!") In a roundabout way, that's the point. The sketches are consistently smart and smartly acted and flow easily from ordinary premises to weird conclusions.

  • Hank Stuever

    Discovery's Bering Sea Gold doesn’t seem at first like it has crossed any new reality TV frontier, relying on elements and structure familiar to the form. Enticingly (to the network), it combines the ocean and the gold and the cold and the reactive testosterone among bad-tempered desperados. To which I am surprised to cry: Eureka, they’ve found it! Bering Sea Gold is a testament to how thoroughly absorbing the genre can still be, when it’s done right.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Kiefer Sutherland displays his softer side in Fox's Touch, a touchy-feely drama merging paranormal, spiritual and sweetly familial elements. shows off his acting chops, long forgotten, in scene after scene. It's heavier lifting than usual for the actor who was often reduced to caricature in 24. Sutherland is all about vulnerability in a show whose goal is nothing short of proving the interconnectedness of human life. We'll see if audiences can tolerate the notion of profound interrelatedness as weekly entertainment.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad