tvnewscheck focus on new media

New Media's New Status At TV Groups

In just a few short years, digital efforts like Web sites and mobile at traditional TV station groups have skyrocketed from ancillary afterthoughts to top-of-mind content and revenue centers. Here's who's leading the charge into this brave new world at the top revenue-producing groups.
By
TVNewsCheck,

When Ron Stitt, Fox Television Station's VP of digital media, joined the group three years ago, digital efforts like the station's Web sites were considered ancillary projects, hardly vital.

Since then, however, Stitt and the new media he oversees have moved up the company ranks. With station Web sites now nearly universally accepted as an essential means of reaching audiences -- and making money -- Stitt's endeavors are no longer considered second tier.

Story continues after the ad

"Digital is really now part of our DNA," said Stitt, adding that Fox's new media audience has grown to many million users during his tenure. "It's really now integral to the broader business."

Stitt is not alone.

TVNewsCheck's survey of the top revenue-producing TV station groups found that most now have dedicated new media executives, often with the rank of vice president or higher (see chart below). They invariably oversee the local Web sites, and in most cases also have responsibility for various mobile initiatives and other digital efforts.

And a sampling of these executives  -- many in their jobs three years or less -- said that like Stitt they have seen their status and their contribution to their companies grow.

Robb Richter, LIN Television's senior vice president of new media, said LIN's commitment to Web sites has grown dramatically since he joined the company in 2006,. In fact, other than a few scattered station Web sites, new media was virtually nonexistent before Richter came on board, he said. "We were really behind the eight ball."

In the last two-and-a-half years, Richter said, LIN has watched its new media endeavors take off. Digital revenue accounted for 12 percent of LIN's total revenue in the first quarter of 2009 versus just 5 percent in the first quarter of 2008, he said.

"First and foremost, television is what we built this business on and we're very successful. That's still the core of our business and the core of our revenue," he said. "But new media will have a much higher growth rate, and we envision that new media will be a substantial percentage of our overall revenue."

Adam Symson, Scripps Television Group's vice president, interactive, is operating on a similar premise. In the two-and-a-half years since joining Scripps -- the job didn't exist before that -- Symson has helped launch Web sites as well as mobile and iPhone applications.

"We fundamentally believe that in order to win the war in the local media landscape you need to win the battle on the Internet," said Symson.

"The power is in the hands of the consumers so we've got to make our content ready for where the consumer wants it."

At Univision's headquarters, Kevin Conroy, president of Univision Interactive Media, has been doing just that, overseeing Univision.com and Univision Móvil, two of the country's largest Spanish-language new media outlets.

Media companies have little choice but to respond to what audiences want, Conroy said. "The goal should be to enable consumers to have access to media experiences anytime, anywhere. It's all about choice."

Though the platforms that digital media executives are working with may be new, some of the concepts they are embracing are not, they said.

Thomas Cox, Meredith Broadcast Group's vice president, broadcast solutions, said his job has grown to include the oversight of new media over the past two years.

Cox said that he sees broadcast TV and the new media as complementary, an idea that dates back more than a decade when Meredith started cross-promoting its magazine and TV station content.

"We are still a content company, no matter what," Cox said. "It doesn't matter what our brand is or what our affiliation is. The life of the station flows through that content."

BROADCAST TV'S NEW MEDIA MAVENS

The following list comprises the top 20 TV stations groups (ranked according to BIAfn's 2007 revenue estimates) along with the names of the executive or executives in charge of online ventures. In most cases, the executives also have responsibility for mobile and other new media efforts. Absent from the list are the executives of Local TV and Newport Television. Neither group responded to the survey.

1. FOX: Ron Stitt, vice president, digital media.

2. NBC: Brian Buchwald, senior vice president, NBC Local Integrated Media.

3. CBS: Jonathan Leess, president, CBS TV Stations Digital Media Group, left the company at the end of 2008. While the group searches for a successor, group president Tom Kane is overseeing the Web sites.

4. ABC: Bill Burton, executive vice president, digital media.

5. TRIBUNE: Marc Chase, president, Tribune Interactive, oversees online and mobile operations for newspapers as well as broadcast stations.

6. GANNETT: Chris Saridakis, senior vice president and chief digital officer, oversees new media for newspapers and as well as the TV stations.

7. HEARST TELEVISION: Roger Keating, senior vice president, digital media, which includes online, mobile and other digital TV projects.

Edit Article

Comments (6) -

HowardMBurgers Nickname posted over 3 years ago
To me the jury is still out as to whether having duplicate content available on the website of a call letter station counts for a hill of beans. In my view, TV stations should be concentrating on building, then maintaining core elements with real local news that matters to viewers, rather than jumping on the net bandwagon looking for salvation. The most financially sucessful internet plays remain as search and porn. To date that dynamic hasn't changed much. I maintain rather than staffing up for a million dollars annually here and there, why not focus those resources on hiring real investigative writers and reporters to build your news programming with something that stands out and will garner millions in revenue? Forget the 3D graphics, sounders, snypes, L-bars, and flashy objects for morons. Do news on TV again, not merely infotainment. We're TV stations, not Yahoo.
TV-1 One posted over 3 years ago
I agree with Howard.....Credible, relevant and engaging news content is what will win customers back to your station.
Jim Clouse posted over 3 years ago
While the TV station groups have come a long way in the past three years, they are still reactive rather than proactive. None are visionary . They do not know how to properly utilize their station websites to give the visitor what he wants. All of their websites are poorly designed, way too busy/cluttered, load way too slowly, and are cluttered with banner ads that monetize some of the web traffic but leave too much monetization on the table. What visitors want is speed, dynamic content updated in real time, simplicity, and a clean, fast loading site. Our business model fully monetizes website traffic and delivers a unique revenue stream while empowering both the advertiser and end user. Take a look: http://ClikitySplit.com/partner.aspx Jim Clouse http://ClikitySplit.com
Zev Bek posted over 3 years ago
I beg to differ with HOWARD. As a "news-junkie," I find web based access to TV news coverage to be a step in the RIGHT direction. It's the sites themselves, and the news anchors (or management) that are missing the point. First, as a viewer, let me explain why I would go to a TV station's website and what is lacking in the connection to "on-the-air" comments to telling the viewer to check their sites. If I find a particular story interesting, I generally want to use the net to search about the elements of the story further (or I may surfing the stations during news times and miss part of a story). The biggest problem is actually finding the story when I get to their site. A small few TELL you where to look for the story. When they don't, I feel like the station wants me to wander aimlessly to see IF I can find it (while being distracted by ads that bring in a certain amount of revenue). When I get past the condescension of HOWARD's closing comments, I agree that some sites are too "flashy" and probably are wasting the time and money put into that effort. Stories covered on-air that would have more detailed information on the web would be a plus. Promotion of noteworthy events occurring in the local market would be another great use of the TV website. Anything that would get advertisers to buy space promoting discounts or specials in the local market would be another BIG plus. Creative use of the site versus creative "looking" sites is of interest to me. SO- let me make these final suggestions to TV news management. 1) Have the anchors specify where to look for stories (it would be a great way to track what really interests viewers if done properly). 2) Get stories viewed on-air onto the site in a timely fashion (preferably BEFORE it airs so I can find it). 3) Give incentives for people to look at your sites to in order to develop reasons to actually check out your particular site. AND to HOWARD- you say "WE're TV stations...." What do you actually DO??? Having a "vision" might be helpful in your work.
Joseph Pedri posted over 3 years ago
It's all about video. Station websites offer VOD news stories. When a "viewer" is ready for his news fix, it's right there on the station website. Why even wait for the story to run on the 5 o'clock news? If the story is in the can, put it on your site. We're mostly talking about two different audience groups here anyway, those who religiously watch news on TV and those whose schedules (or preferences) bring them to station websites for their news. If the story is complete, put it on your site. You want to build your online viewership? Offer them something they can't get anywhere else, true "breaking news stories" on your website.
Pat Clark posted over 3 years ago
I just looked at ClikitySplit. Advertising and media paradigms need an overhaul and this is the best website I have ever seen bar none to address it. Local media outlets should take a look at this. Changing categories with just a mouseover and click is the technology needed for today's search. New search results were shown right on the same map. Current search engines require a brand new search. ClikitySplit does not. ClikitySplit is very visual, fast as lightning and has no tacky banner ads. This website merits attention.

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2905.66 +45.98 (+1.61%)
NYSE 8060.43 +115.00 (+1.45%)
S&P 500 1344.90 +19.36 (+1.46%)
Updated 02/04 4:19a ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for February 3, 2012
  • 1.
    3.9/11
  • 2.
    3.5/9
  • 3.
    2.5/7
  • 4.
    1.5/4
  • 5.
    1.5/4
  • 6.
    0.9/2
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • Robert Lloyd

    Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele, veterans of Fox's sketch comedy MADtv, have a new series of their own, Comedy Central's Key & Peele. It is a genial, at times almost genteel, half-hour in which the pair's obvious niceness shines through even their more pugnacious characters. (Key's version of road rage is to shout, "Selfish!") In a roundabout way, that's the point. The sketches are consistently smart and smartly acted and flow easily from ordinary premises to weird conclusions.

  • Hank Stuever

    Discovery's Bering Sea Gold doesn’t seem at first like it has crossed any new reality TV frontier, relying on elements and structure familiar to the form. Enticingly (to the network), it combines the ocean and the gold and the cold and the reactive testosterone among bad-tempered desperados. To which I am surprised to cry: Eureka, they’ve found it! Bering Sea Gold is a testament to how thoroughly absorbing the genre can still be, when it’s done right.

  • Neil Genzlinger

    All Star Dealers, Discovery Channel's sports-memorabilia addition to the bloated auction/pawnshop/storage locker subgenre of reality television, should have been a winner, with endless stories to draw on and a built-in fan base. But rather than find its own formula, it was content to borrow from existing shows, and it borrowed all the wrong things.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Kiefer Sutherland displays his softer side in Fox's Touch, a touchy-feely drama merging paranormal, spiritual and sweetly familial elements. shows off his acting chops, long forgotten, in scene after scene. It's heavier lifting than usual for the actor who was often reduced to caricature in 24. Sutherland is all about vulnerability in a show whose goal is nothing short of proving the interconnectedness of human life. We'll see if audiences can tolerate the notion of profound interrelatedness as weekly entertainment.

  • Tim Goodman

    Let's jump right to the most obvious of all sentiments when it comes to HBO's new horse racing/gambling series Luck: Do not bet against David Milch in this one. Like a lot of HBO series, Luck will require patience. It's telling a dense story with nuanced characters and it doesn't feel the need to rush in, like a network series, and hammer home the main themes. But each episode is more enriching, more engrossing than the last and there's Hoffman's superb turn at the forefront, even though his story unfolds with the least rush. Luck is a smart and ambitious series that looks to truly pay off in the home stretch.

  • Mike Hale

    The timing of FX's animated series Unsupervised is unfortunate. A kind of reversed Beavis and Butt-Head — in which the teenage heroes, while losers in just about every way, are also social strivers yearning for suburban domesticity and dispensing Oprah Winfrey-style affirmations — it has the bad luck of coming along three months after the original was revived by MTV. The new show looks awfully pale by comparison.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad