Tech Spotlight: BIAnalytix

Decentrix Offers Big Brother in a Box

Page 2 of 3

For example, in the implementation we've been doing with one large station group, they have their own in-house systems. They've got their own tech team and built all their own traffic systems, so they have the knowledge to fairly rapidly map to our definitions.

So your system extracts and organizes data from their system?

Story continues after the ad

Correct. It takes the data it comes across and goes through a process in the data warehouse called ETL -- for extract, transform and load. That process essentially pulls up the data. The best way to think about it is that it cleanses the data and puts it into a form that allows you to readily report.

Here's an example of why that's necessary: Say you've got a very large group, perhaps 30 TV stations, and, at every one of those, people may have entered an advertiser slightly differently. We might find different descriptions at each station.

When you move everything into a data warehouse, you need to have the same description, not a dozen different descriptions floating around in the analysis. The ETL process does that cleanup. It maps all those disparate elements into a single description that allows you to view the data in a sensible way.

You say that speed and instant access are important components of the system.

Yes, and you also want to know that the information is up to date, and that you can get to it in seconds. You don't have to call someone to have a report run. You don't have to wait for hours or days.

But it can only be as current as when it was last updated.

Yes, and in large measure it depends on the system that's the source for the information. If it's a traffic system where data is only updated each night, then it would be as recent as the night before.

But if it's a traffic system with the ability to provide a constant feed of data so that every change is fed in at real time, then the system can be [fully up to date] and the CEO can look at the dashboard and watch it change second by second.

How does such instant information benefit the CEO? I assume, for example, he can take quick action if a station is underperforming.

Correct. What you do normally with these systems is provide the ability to set up what are called KPIs, or key performance indicators. Essentially, they provide analysis of the health of the business.

Are KPIs based on targets?

On targets, objectives and forecasts. They may be targets that are comparatives. For example, you might want to be looking at an objective to increase revenue 10 percent above the same time last year.

Those objectives can be fed into the system to create KPIs. A CEO can look at his dashboard and determine, for example, that target revenue performance is on a downward trend, say, 5 percent off from where it should be.

What he can then do is quickly drill down on that and explode out the information so he can look at all of the stations. He can identify the station that's causing the poor performance. He can drill down further and identify the salespeople that are underperforming.

Or maybe it's an advertiser that is off the mark. You have the ability to drill down in a matter of seconds and determine the nature of the problem. Rather than have to ask other people, you can immediately go directly to the individuals concerned to get the matter addressed.

It sounds like a very sophisticated monitoring tool.

It is indeed. It's intended to give the heartbeat of the business, and to always be readily available. It is a monitoring tool that everybody can use, and as such nobody gets surprised about what's going on. There should be no reason why a salesperson doesn't know they're underperforming -- or exceeding their budget.

Does it replace existing systems?

It doesn't replace anything. It is a brand new opportunity, a tool that media operators have never had access to before. The transactional systems they have -- the traffic systems, the program management systems -- were never really designed to provide this kind of forecasting and analysis.

Transactional systems tend to be very bad when it comes to trying to report in a timely way the kinds of things that management needs, and sometimes they take hours or days to produce. Often by the time you have the data, it's stale and irrelevant.

What's your competition?

Many businesses are starting to work in the business intelligence area. Very large companies like IBM provide tools to build business intelligence solutions, but we're the only company providing an out-of-the-box solution that tracks the whole process for the media industries.

What media other than broadcasting do you serve?

Edit Article

Comments (0) -

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2915.86 +11.78 (+0.41%)
NYSE 8082.98 +13.27 (+0.16%)
S&P 500 1349.96 +2.91 (+0.22%)
Updated 02/08 5:41p ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content

Ratings

Overnights, adults 18-49 for February 7, 2012
  • 1.
    3.1/8
  • 2.
    3.0/8
  • 3.
    2.4/6
  • 4.
    2.0/5
  • 5.
    1.6/4
  • 6.
    0.6/1
Source: Nielsen
Reviews
Opinions
Features
  • Neil Genzlinger

    Smash, NBC’s series about backstage Broadway, comes with New York and Hollywood names off screen (Steven Spielberg, Therese Rebeck) and on (Debra Messing and Brian d’Arcy James). Given that pedigree, you’re expecting to be bowled over by the pilot, but it ends up feeling like a collage of devices from the zillions of previous backstage plays, musicals and movies. However, be patient — Smash gets better as it goes along and by Episode 3 it shows signs of becoming an addictive pleasure along the lines of this season’s Revenge.

  • Lori Rackl

    Pop some Dramamine before watching ABC's new horror series, The River, because the shaky camera work is more likely to make you seasick than scared. You can, however, skip the sleeping pill. The River's two-hour premiere should suffice. Billed as a thriller, the show tries hard to be terrifying and eerie in a Paranormal Activity kind of way. It ends up being hokey and, even worse, boring.

  • Robert Lloyd

    Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele, veterans of Fox's sketch comedy MADtv, have a new series of their own, Comedy Central's Key & Peele. It is a genial, at times almost genteel, half-hour in which the pair's obvious niceness shines through even their more pugnacious characters. (Key's version of road rage is to shout, "Selfish!") In a roundabout way, that's the point. The sketches are consistently smart and smartly acted and flow easily from ordinary premises to weird conclusions.

  • Hank Stuever

    Discovery's Bering Sea Gold doesn’t seem at first like it has crossed any new reality TV frontier, relying on elements and structure familiar to the form. Enticingly (to the network), it combines the ocean and the gold and the cold and the reactive testosterone among bad-tempered desperados. To which I am surprised to cry: Eureka, they’ve found it! Bering Sea Gold is a testament to how thoroughly absorbing the genre can still be, when it’s done right.

  • Joanne Ostrow

    Kiefer Sutherland displays his softer side in Fox's Touch, a touchy-feely drama merging paranormal, spiritual and sweetly familial elements. shows off his acting chops, long forgotten, in scene after scene. It's heavier lifting than usual for the actor who was often reduced to caricature in 24. Sutherland is all about vulnerability in a show whose goal is nothing short of proving the interconnectedness of human life. We'll see if audiences can tolerate the notion of profound interrelatedness as weekly entertainment.

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad